CCMR Home COMMITTEE for
COUNTERING MILITARY RECRUITMENT



Who We Are

Articles

Upcoming Events

Past Events

Downloads

Links

No Child Left Behind

Political Cartoons

Contact Us


ArticlesWar Protests: General


Pentagon Singles Out Schools as Security Threats

Meg Rafferty,  The Daily Free Press (Boston U)

January 24, 2006


 (U-WIRE) BOSTON -- According to the Pentagon, several universities in
 the U.S. may pose a danger to national security.

 On-campus protests against military recruitment landed eight national
 universities, including New York University and University of
 California-Berkeley, on a Pentagon watch list for being threats to
 national security.

 In mid-December, MSNBC released the list from the Department of
 Defense database that cited various domestic "threats" -- including
 the college campus demonstrations.

 The list, which was part of a 400-page document, recorded more than
 1,500 domestic occurrences over the past 10 months, ranking them as
 either "credible" or "not credible".

 According to the document, all of the campus protests were aimed at
 campus recruiters and were held at the New York University, the State
 University of New York at Albany, Southern Connecticut State
 University, City College of the City University of New York,
 UC-Berkeley and UC-Santa Cruz, an unspecified campus of the University
 of Wisconsin and "a New Jersey university."

 "We were surprised, to say the least, that our university was on the
 list," said Josh Taylor, a New York University spokesperson. "We were
 a bit concerned, understandably, because we are not entirely clear how
 we wound up on it."

 Taylor said the Solomon Amendment, which deals with military
 recruitment on college campuses, was the main reason for the NYU
 protests that were cited.

 "It's hardly top secret information that was being discussed," he
 said. "The first amendment is pretty important so we're certainly not
 going to discourage our students from speaking out about issues that
 concern them."

 The Solomon Amendment was brought to the national stage in the U.S.
 Supreme Court case FAIR vs. Rumsfeld.

 In the case, the Forum for Academic and Constitutional Rights contends
 that the Solomon amendment violates First Amendment rights by
 allotting federal funding only to schools that permit military
 recruitment on campus -- recruitment that excludes openly gay, lesbian
 and bisexual students.

 NYU protesters' opposition to the Solomon Amendment and various
 campuses anti-war demonstrations are two of many global activities
 that the Pentagon monitors in the name of national security, according
 to a Pentagon Spokesperson.

 "This counterterrorism and surveillance are across the board," said a
 Pentagon spokesperson. "This is not just about antiwar protests and it
 is not targeted against one type of threat -- this is a broad issue."

 Compiled by the Pentagon's Counterintelligence Field Activity, the
 record contains "dots of information" provided by worldwide law
 enforcers, intelligence groups, security agencies and citizens who
 report "suspicious activity," the spokesman said. "These dots are put
 in to try to 'connect the dots' before another major terrorist attack
 occurs."

 After Sept. 11th, 2001, the Department of Defense developed a database
 of "unfiltered" threat information called the Threat and Local
 Observation Notice, or TALON.

 This system was designed to assemble process and analyze suspicious
 activity reports to identify invisible terrorist activity.

 "While the concerns are evident, we do have strict regulations as to
 what kind of information we are allowed to put into this database,"
 said the spokesperson. "It is a method of protection and an attempt to
 interrupt the cycle before the next terrorist attack."

 According to an unclassified Pentagon document, the TALON report is a
 web-based entry form that lists reportable events, or "non-specific
 threats to DoD interests."

 These threats include: suspected surveillance of DoD facilities and
 personnel, threats of security, bomb threats and unusual repetitive
 activity.

 The only university to be deemed as a "credible" threat in the
 expansive DoD document was the UCSC.

 The targeted event, a non-violent Students Against War protest at
 UCSC, was held on April 5 and drew more than 250 students and some
 faculty who were opposed to military recruiting at an on-campus
 college career fair.

 "We hoped that it would make a statement and to show that recruiters
 weren't welcome on campus," said second year UCSC student and
 participant Kot Hordynski. "We weren't thinking it would be deemed a
 credible threat to national security."

 Hordynski, who is from Berkley, Calif., has been a member of Students
 Against War campus group since it began in January of 2005. He said he
 was disturbed but not surprised but the Pentagon's surveillance.

 "Honestly, when we learned about that we were pretty astounded,"
 Hordynski said. "What we feel we do is just a demonstration of our
 first amendment right and what we set out to do is non-violent."

 He said since MSNBC released information about the Pentagon's list,
 the student group has received increasing support on campus -- even
 from those who do not completely agree with the group's philosophy.

 "We want to stick to our message to end occupation abroad and to
 oppose recruitment on campus," he said. "But we want to get the
 message out that the government wastes their money -It's a complete
 abomination that we should be spied on."

 After the report was released, UCSC made a statement that they were
 opposed to the spying but Hordynski said, "We have our doubt about how
 true that is, so we've been trying to talk to them and get more
 information."

 In one of the two official statements released by UCSC Chancellor
 Denice Denton, she said the University had not provided any federal
 agency with information about the event in April and did not receive a
 request for such information.

 "Statements that UCSC Campus Police surreptitiously gather information
 about campus activities are incorrect. This is not the case," Denton
 said. "We do not know the method by which information was obtained and
 subsequently included in the Pentagon database."

 Denton's letter was sent to all UCSC colleagues and stated that the
 UCSC administration asked local Congress members to, "request a
 definition of "credible threat;" to determine why the April 5
 demonstration was classified as one; to learn how the information was
 gathered; and to address our concern that future monitoring could have
 a chilling effect on the exercise of free speech on our campus."

 U.S. Congress members Anna Eshoo and Zoe Lofgren both issued
 statements about the importance of freedom and made pledges to find
 information about the DoD surveillance and allegations.

 "We do not tolerate violence," Denton said in the letter. "We do
 insist upon the rights of peaceful assembly as integral to the
 political freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. We will do
 everything in our power to protect those rights for all."


This archive consists of a topically organized selection of articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen material relevant to the work of Eugene, Oregon’s Committee for Countering Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and groups with similar goals.

Because our web site is public, personal comments about the articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included. If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections. If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com   

 In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposed.