CCMR Home COMMITTEE for
COUNTERING MILITARY RECRUITMENT



Who We Are

Articles

Upcoming Events

Past Events

Downloads

Links

No Child Left Behind

Political Cartoons

Contact Us


ArticlesMilitary Service: Women


Soldier Complains of Sexual Coercion

Susan PalmerRegister-Guard
June 15, 2006

 
A Eugene soldier being  investigated for deserting her military police unit has alleged that  she was sexually harassed by two superiors and coerced into a sexual  relationship with a sergeant while she was in Iraq.
Suzanne Swift, a specialist  with the 54th Military Police Co. based at Fort Lewis, Wash., was  arrested at her mother's house in south Eugene on Sunday and held at  the Lane County Jail before being escorted by military police to Fort  Lewis on Tuesday.
In a brief phone interview  from the base, Swift said three sergeants directly in her chain of  command began propositioning her for sex almost from the minute she  arrived overseas. She was in Iraq from February 2004 until February  2005. When her unit was redeployed to Iraq in January 2006, she refused  to go and remained in Oregon.
Swift is restricted to her base while the Army looks into her case, Fort Lewis spokesman Joe Hitt said.
Though she can't leave, she is being treated with dignity and respect, he said.
Her unauthorized absence  violates the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Her commanding officer  could recommend a reprimand or a court-martial, which could result in  her loss of all Army benefits and a sentence of up to five years in  prison.
It's not clear how long the  investigation into her absence will take, said Hitt, who did not  specifically confirm that Swift's allegations are also part of the  inquiry.
"The Army is investigating the details surrounding her absence from the unit," he said.
But Swift's attorney, Larry  Hildes, said that her commanding officer, Lt. Col. James Switzer,  assured him that he planned a criminal investigation.
"He's taking her allegations of sexual harassment seriously," Hildes said.
Hildes said that when Swift  complained to the appropriate Army authority, an equal opportunity  officer, her complaints were ignored.
For rejecting the advances of  two of the noncommissioned officers, Swift said she was publicly  humiliated and forced to do extra work.
Swift said she had a sexual  relationship with her immediate supervisor in Iraq, but that it was a  coerced relationship based on his power over her.
"In a combat situation, your  squad leader is deciding whether you live or die. If he wants you to  run across a minefield, you run across a minefield," she said.
Swift drove a Humvee in  Karbala, a city southwest of Baghdad. On combat patrol, she was  frequently assigned to visit Iraqi police stations, often the targets  of insurgents.
"You have to be on your guard the whole time," she said.
While Swift didn't talk about  sexual harassment with the other women in her unit, she's certain she  wasn't the only one targeted.
"Nobody talks about it," she said.
But Swift isn't the only one  to make these kinds of accusations. News reports of women being  harassed and sexually assaulted in Iraq and Kuwait in 2004 prompted the  Department of Defense to create a task force to examine the extent of  the problem and to develop recommendations for dealing with it.
The Defense Department's  sexual assault task force report concluded that its policies and  programs aimed at preventing sexual assault were inconsistent and  incomplete and left women particularly vulnerable in joint combat  environments.
Swift said she believes that  the military is taking her allegations seriously now. She is back in  the barracks with her company, which returned in April from its second  tour in Iraq. Swift said her fellow soldiers aren't treating her any  differently than they did before. Those who were friends with her six  months ago are still friends, she said.
"I hope more women will speak out against the horrible things that happen," she said.
But such allegations are  notoriously difficult to prove, often devolving to the word of the  victim against the word of the accused, Hildes said.
"That's the nature of sexual harassment," he said. "There are almost never witnesses."
While her allegations are  serious, Swift faces a serious charge herself. By abandoning her unit  for more than 30 days - the federal warrant lists her as missing since  Jan. 9, 2006 - she moves from unauthorized absentee to the more serious  category of deserter, a soldier with no intent to return, said Kathleen  Duignan, executive director of the National Institute of Military  Justice. The nonprofit agency works to improve public understanding of  the military justice system.
Her commander probably will  take into account aggravating factors in her case, such as deserting  during a time of war, Duignan said.
"It's a unique military  offense," she said. "It goes to good order, morale and discipline." An  effective fighting force requires soldiers who are ready to respond to  their orders, she said.
That will have to be balanced against the harassment allegations Swift has made.
"I can't see it offering a  complete defense, because they would say she should have continued to  bring it up through the chain of command," Duignan said.
Hildes said he expects Swift  will be discharged from the Army rather than face a court-martial, but  Fort Lewis spokesman Hitt said no decision has been made yet.
Either way, the issues  represented by this case - desertion and failure of trust among  soldiers who need to work together - are troublesome on the battlefield.
"When good order and  discipline falls apart, your effectiveness diminishes," Duignan said.  "You take it a step further, and those are the kinds of things that  lose wars."


This archive consists of a topically organized selection of articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen material relevant to the work of Eugene, Oregon’s Committee for Countering Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and groups with similar goals.

Because our web site is public, personal comments about the articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included. If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections. If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com   

 In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposed.