|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
Soldier Complains of Sexual Coercion
Susan Palmer, Register-Guard
June 15, 2006
A Eugene soldier being investigated for deserting her military
police unit has alleged that she was sexually harassed by two
superiors and coerced into a sexual relationship with a sergeant
while she was in Iraq.
Suzanne Swift, a specialist with the 54th Military Police Co.
based at Fort Lewis, Wash., was arrested at her mother's house in
south Eugene on Sunday and held at the Lane County Jail before
being escorted by military police to Fort Lewis on Tuesday.
In a brief phone interview from the base, Swift said three
sergeants directly in her chain of command began propositioning
her for sex almost from the minute she arrived overseas. She was
in Iraq from February 2004 until February 2005. When her unit was
redeployed to Iraq in January 2006, she refused to go and
remained in Oregon.
Swift is restricted to her base while the Army looks into her case, Fort Lewis spokesman Joe Hitt said.
Though she can't leave, she is being treated with dignity and respect, he said.
Her unauthorized absence violates the Uniform Code of Military
Justice. Her commanding officer could recommend a reprimand or a
court-martial, which could result in her loss of all Army
benefits and a sentence of up to five years in prison.
It's not clear how long the investigation into her absence will
take, said Hitt, who did not specifically confirm that Swift's
allegations are also part of the inquiry.
"The Army is investigating the details surrounding her absence from the unit," he said.
But Swift's attorney, Larry Hildes, said that her commanding
officer, Lt. Col. James Switzer, assured him that he planned a
criminal investigation.
"He's taking her allegations of sexual harassment seriously," Hildes said.
Hildes said that when Swift complained to the appropriate Army
authority, an equal opportunity officer, her complaints were
ignored.
For rejecting the advances of two of the noncommissioned
officers, Swift said she was publicly humiliated and forced to do
extra work.
Swift said she had a sexual relationship with her immediate
supervisor in Iraq, but that it was a coerced relationship based
on his power over her.
"In a combat situation, your squad leader is deciding whether you
live or die. If he wants you to run across a minefield, you run
across a minefield," she said.
Swift drove a Humvee in Karbala, a city southwest of Baghdad. On
combat patrol, she was frequently assigned to visit Iraqi police
stations, often the targets of insurgents.
"You have to be on your guard the whole time," she said.
While Swift didn't talk about sexual harassment with the other
women in her unit, she's certain she wasn't the only one targeted.
"Nobody talks about it," she said.
But Swift isn't the only one to make these kinds of accusations.
News reports of women being harassed and sexually assaulted in
Iraq and Kuwait in 2004 prompted the Department of Defense to
create a task force to examine the extent of the problem and to
develop recommendations for dealing with it.
The Defense Department's sexual assault task force report
concluded that its policies and programs aimed at preventing
sexual assault were inconsistent and incomplete and left women
particularly vulnerable in joint combat environments.
Swift said she believes that the military is taking her
allegations seriously now. She is back in the barracks with her
company, which returned in April from its second tour in Iraq.
Swift said her fellow soldiers aren't treating her any
differently than they did before. Those who were friends with her
six months ago are still friends, she said.
"I hope more women will speak out against the horrible things that happen," she said.
But such allegations are notoriously difficult to prove, often
devolving to the word of the victim against the word of the
accused, Hildes said.
"That's the nature of sexual harassment," he said. "There are almost never witnesses."
While her allegations are serious, Swift faces a serious charge
herself. By abandoning her unit for more than 30 days - the
federal warrant lists her as missing since Jan. 9, 2006 - she
moves from unauthorized absentee to the more serious category of
deserter, a soldier with no intent to return, said Kathleen
Duignan, executive director of the National Institute of Military
Justice. The nonprofit agency works to improve public understanding
of the military justice system.
Her commander probably will take into account aggravating factors
in her case, such as deserting during a time of war, Duignan said.
"It's a unique military offense," she said. "It goes to good
order, morale and discipline." An effective fighting force
requires soldiers who are ready to respond to their orders, she
said.
That will have to be balanced against the harassment allegations Swift has made.
"I can't see it offering a complete defense, because they would
say she should have continued to bring it up through the chain of
command," Duignan said.
Hildes said he expects Swift will be discharged from the Army
rather than face a court-martial, but Fort Lewis spokesman Hitt
said no decision has been made yet.
Either way, the issues represented by this case - desertion and
failure of trust among soldiers who need to work together - are
troublesome on the battlefield.
"When good order and discipline falls apart, your effectiveness
diminishes," Duignan said. "You take it a step further, and those
are the kinds of things that lose wars."
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|