|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
Veterans Against the War
Patrick Resta and Derek Seidman, IWVA
November 15, 2005
I want to
discuss Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW), but first a little
background on you. Can you tell us about your service in Iraq? When
were you in Iraq?
I served as a medic in a tank battalion in Iraq from March to November
of 2004. I went over there with the North Carolina Army National
Guard's 30th Brigade Combat Team and we were assigned to the regular
Army's 1st Infantry Division. I had two main jobs while I was there. I
was either working in our clinic where we saw everything from the cold
and flu to sports injuries and gunshot wounds, or I was going out with
platoons on patrols of towns, roads, or to get supplies
Were you critical of the war before you were sent to Iraq? How did your
feelings toward the war and occupation change while you were there?
I was definitely critical of the war before it began and I protested it
during the build up, after it started, and until I left. When I first
got to Fort Jackson (South Carolina) in October of 2001, I was meeting
all of these people being called out of the Individual Ready Reserve
and they were telling me that an invasion of Iraq was next. I was
skeptical at first, but when it hit the papers I realized that those
people warning me had honestly known.
Once I got there, what I saw was a lot worse than what I could have
ever imagined. All of the things we had been told that we were going
there to do were shown unequivocally to be lies. We were told we
weren't supposed to treat Iraqi civilians unless they were about to die
and only if that injury was a result of an attack directed at us or
inflicted by us. Our supervisor told my platoon that "the Geneva
Conventions don't exist in Iraq and that's in writing if any of you
want to see it."
He really said that? What did he mean? How did this make you feel?
Those were his exact words in front of about eight soldiers. I think it
caught us all initially by surprise, that someone in command would say
such a thing. Obviously, he wasn't coming up with that on his own. He'd
been instructed that it was the policy in place and to make sure that
it was followed.
He wanted us to put aside any reservations we had about doing things
that violated the Geneva Conventions, our roles as non combatants, or
our ethics. Again, this stuff isn't something a sergeant just makes up
laying in his bunk at night. This is coming from the top on down and
it's a shame that the people responsible for propagating these policies
will never be held accountable. Hearing it said openly and publicly
definitely didn't make me feel comfortable with my leadership or with
the direction that the military was headed in.
You could have been held accountable for violating the rules of the
Geneva Convention. Had you ever thought about reporting what he said so
he—or whoever made that
policy—could be held responsible?
Of course, I thought of reporting him, but who would I turn him in to?
His boss was telling him to say that. I think that when you look at it
these things, they are coming from the Secretary of Defense and
probably higher. I decided that I wasn't going to do anything that I
wasn't comfortable doing and take note if I witnessed anything that I
believed to be illegal. I think that's all someone can do in that kind
of a situation.
Did you have other experiences that had a similar disillusioning effect on you?
My unit got to our base inside Iraq almost a year to the day after the
war started. I think that for most of us the WMD issue had become a
joke at that point. I was repeatedly told that we were going there to
help the Iraqi people. Shortly after getting there we were told that we
weren’t to treat Iraqi civilians unless they were
about to die and that their injury had been caused by an attack or
perceived attack on US forces— things like people
being shot at checkpoints, roadside bombs meant for us that injured
civilians, or car bombs meant for us that injured civilians. Some
captain isn’t making these rules up in his tent;
these come from the top and have been Department of Defense policy
since day one.
Civilians were turned away at our gate and told to go use their own
facilities. Once you see these facilities it’s
readily apparent why they’re not being used. The
hospitals in my area had only one type of antibiotic, no glass in the
windows, little if any functioning diagnostic equipment, reused
surgical instruments without proper sterilization, and on and on.
Even when on patrol in towns, we were expected to turn civilians away.
Our leadership would have informal investigations if they thought any
medicine was missing and had been given to civilians. They kept basic
life saving medical equipment under lock and key in a shipping
container. I was really sickened by the total lack of value they had
for any life, American or Iraqi.
The events of 9/11 were especially tragic for you—
your aunt and uncle were killed in the World Trade Center. How did this
personal tragedy affect your views on the war and what you were made to
do in Iraq?
I certainly felt that it was misguided and a total misallocation of
resources. What really bothered me though was hearing people in the
military say that that was why we were there or that weapons of mass
destruction had been found. All of the misconceptions that the American
public has are repeated by some of the people there that should know
better. There are certainly those within the military that believe that
we are there for some kind of revenge. I don’t think
that this country needs any more enemies in the world, and
that’s all we’re creating by
being in Iraq. To see the children being radicalized by what they were
seeing and the way that they were living gives me pause when I think
about how the world will look in twenty years.
Speaking of the situation in Iraq, what can you tell us about the effects of war and occupation on Iraqis?
I didn't see any improvement in the situation for the locals during my
time there. The most I saw being done for the civilian infrastructure
was the paving of some roads. The real construction and real money are
going to build large military complexes so that the US military can set
up a permanent presence in Iraq. We were eighteen months into the war
and the Iraqi hospital still didn't have glass in some of its windows
and only one type of antibiotic.
When did you join IVAW and what made you decide to join?
I joined IVAW at their first formal national meeting here in Philly in January 2005.
I got back to the states two days before Thanksgiving in 2004. At a
Thanksgiving party I met Jim Talib, who was a member of IVAW. It was a
strange night, and neither of us really wanted to talk about the war.
It's easier to try and put all that behind you and try to get on with
your life. But, at the same time you realize that you can't remain
silent because it will continue and get stronger. My main motivation
has always been to stop other servicemen and women from having to go
through what I went through. My job as a medic was to look out for
soldiers’ morale, welfare, and safety. It's a job I
took very seriously and I'm doing more towards that end now than I ever
did in the military. The leadership of the military and politicians has
abdicated that responsibility and I think that if ever our men and
women in the military needed an advocate, it's right now.
But you were hesitant to get involved at first. Why was this? How did you actually get active? Where did you begin?
It's not easy for vets to get out there and become active and I think
people in the movement need to appreciate that a lot more than they do.
They have to deal with a lot of issues like PTSD, and some are still in
the military and subject to harassment, being made to feel anti-troops
and so on. People that have been there and witnessed what's going on
have the most powerful voice to inform the American public at large of
the realities of this war.
Jim Talib actually signed me up for a talk without telling me. He said
that people really needed to hear my story. So, two days before this
talk he calls and tells me about it and says that I should probably
start writing notes. I definitely wasn't ready for it and it was
difficult. I'd never spoken publicly before, and to add that to only
being home for about a month, it was tough. That first night I spoke
out about the war was at a library in a suburb of Philly to a full
house, and the local media even turned out and heavily covered it.
You mentioned PTSD. A lot of noise was made about the recent 2,000th
death amongst US soldiers in Iraq, but this is just the tip of the
iceberg.
Well, I think you have a lot of issues any time that you talk about the
casualties from this war. The first issue being the reports that only
soldiers that die in Iraq or Kuwait are counted on the killed in action
lists. That's to say that soldiers that die of injuries days, weeks, or
months later in Germany or the US are not counted as having been killed
by the war.
The second issue being the "wounded" of this war. Soldiers are
surviving injuries that they never would have in the past and are
expected to return to society with horrific disabilities. I was just
reading a Washington Post article about a soldier that was a triple
amputee and had a traumatic brain injury. Also, those with mental
health issues from this war are not counted. I think that they are some
of the most dangerous injuries because of the difficulty in diagnosing
and treating them.
Did you experience any form of PTSD upon your return, and do you still?
I did have some problems when I first got back. I think that it's hard
for anyone who has been in that environment to switch back to the way
they were before they went at the snap of a finger. That's why I think
that it's so important for the men and women coming back to get in
touch with other vets and to know that they're not alone in the things
that they're going through. I was very lucky to meet a lot of guys
shortly after I got back and it helped me out a great deal.
Do you think there are a lot of returning soldiers who are against the
war and occupation, but that carry the same kinds of fears, doubts, and
sense of isolation that you initially had when you returned from Iraq?
I absolutely believe that that's the case. The overwhelming desire is
to put all of that behind you and to get on with your life. It's not
fun to dwell on some of those things, so school, work, and other things
become a distraction that you need. It takes most people a while to
digest what they've seen and to decide where they want to go with it.
You mentioned before that you believe some soldiers are hesitant to
speak out for fear of being seen as
“anti-troopsâ€. What do you think of the
“support the troops
“rationale� How do you think IVAW can
challenge this?
Maybe it's a little jaded, but I look at it this way. When I was over
there, I didn't want to get stale brownies or a five minute phone card
in the mail. I wanted the American people demanding to know why
hundreds of soldiers are dead for lies. Because they were sent into a
country that was no threat to this one without basic equipment,
ammunition, training, or even so much as a plan. The only way that you
can support the troops is to demand answers and to hold people
accountable.
Do you think the example of soldiers and vets like yourself speaking
out helps increase the confidence of others who feel uneasy about their
experiences in Iraq?
Absolutely, I think that if we didn’t have the guys
in VVAW (Vietnam Veterans Against the War) to set an example for us
many of us wouldn’t have come out publicly. The
military is a strange place when you start to question the party line.
You feel ostracized and you start to wonder if
you’re the only one that feels the way that you do.
So, I think it’s important that members of the
military know they have a place to go, that they will be welcomed
(mostly), and that they see that the American public wants to know the
truth. We’re not a partisan organization; we talk
about the issues that aren’t being addressed and are
costing people their lives.
I went into the military as a medic because I wanted to be a part of
taking care of the health, safety, and morale of soldiers. I realized
while I was in Iraq that I could a lot more towards that end outside of
the military than I ever could inside it. Really, there are two wars
going on right now; one to end the actual war and another one to get
the men and women that return the care that they deserve.
How would you articulate the basic mission of IVAW?
IVAW has a three part platform: one, an immediate withdrawal of all US
forces. Two, real aid directly to the people of Iraq to rebuild that
country. And three, real healthcare (including mental) for the veterans
of this conflict. A lot of our members also work on other issues as
well, such as radiological munitions, educating kids about the
realities of military service, educating members of the military on the
conscientious objector process, and setting up sessions where vets of
the Iraq War can get together and talk about the war.
How big is the organization right now? How do you view IVAW's future
prospects for growth? What are some of the biggest obstacles towards
growth (in size and influence) for IVAW?
IVAW was founded by six people in July of 2004 and has grown to three
hundred members in just fifteen months. Vets are definitely looking for
a way to get involved in stopping this war, and as soon as they find
out we exist they join and get active. As time goes on we will get
stronger and stronger because resentment is building within the
military. The biggest obstacle we face is just getting our name out
there and letting vets know a focused voice exists for them to help
stop this war. We are almost completely funded by donations so we can't
afford expensive advertisements in the mainstream media. We rely on
word of mouth and face-to-face meetings at protests and other anti war
events.
Do you work with other antiwar military-related organizations like
Military Families Speak Out (MFSO, www.mfso.org), Gold Star Families
for Peace (GSFP, www.gsfp.org), and Veterans for Peace (VFP,
www.veteransforpeace.org)? How do you see IVAW's relationship to these
organizations?
We work with MFSO, GSFP, and VFP quite often. I think that vets and
their families have the clearest and strongest voice to speak the
truths about this war. My wife joined MFSO shortly after I left for
Iraq and members of my unit’s Family Support Group
cursed at her. She actually sent me an email while I was still there
about IVAW first forming.
How do you see antiwar soldiers and veterans being able to affect public opinion on the war and occupation?
I think that those of us who have been there and our families are the
most qualified to talk about this war. We've seen the inner workings
and felt the consequences. We speak in a clear voice about the issues,
and largely put aside the politics. To me this isn't about politics,
it's about principles. The principle that as Americans the only values
we should be exporting to other countries are peace and social justice.
The principle that those responsible for this criminal misuse of the
military must be held accountable so something like this never happens
again. It'll definitely be a long fight and I would beseech everyone
out there to get involved. Many organizations need your help and would
be grateful to receive it. Dr. King said it best, "Our lives begin to
end when we stop speaking out about the things that matter." As someone
who took an oath to do so, I will continue to defend this country and
its Constitution against all enemies— foreign and
domestic.
As someone looking to organize vets against the war and occupation, how
responsive has the civilian antiwar movement been? Any criticisms?
I know that the Rolling Stone article about the antiwar effort didn't
enthuse a lot of people on the far left, but I thought that it was
right on the money. We have to start looking at how to get the average
American involved and on our side. By having a protest that is supposed
to be only about getting us out of Iraq and then letting it get
hijacked by a bunch of political opportunists does nothing to keep the
people from middle America at their first protest coming back. But,
that's always been the case and it's why the movement isn't taken
seriously and never goes anywhere. Too many egos get in the way and
people do offensive things that turn people off. A lot of the stuff in
D.C. on the weekend of September 24th was just beyond the pale, it was
disrespectful to the reason that I was there.
You have to unite people around a cause like the war that they already
agree with you about, and then get them thinking about how their
government behaves in other areas. The Right was able to tie together
all of their disparate movements and fringes and agree on basic
principles to advance their overall agenda and that's why they're
winning right now. It's a shame that we can't do the same and get to
work on accomplishing some of the things that we care about so deeply.
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|