|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
US Military 'Shuts Down' Soldiers' Blogs
Joseph Mallia, Newsday
January 2, 2006
Letters home filled with tales of death and danger, bravery and boredom are a wartime certainty.
And now, as hundreds of soldiers overseas have
started keeping Internet journals about the heat, the homesickness, the
bloodshed, word speeds from the battlefront faster than ever.
More and more, though, U.S. military commanders in
Iraq and Afghanistan are clamping down on these military Web logs,
known as milblogs.
After all, digital photos of blown-up tanks and
gritty comments on urban warfare don't just interest mom and dad.
The enemy, too, has a laptop and satellite link.
Nowadays, milbloggers "get shut down almost as fast
as they're set up," said New York Army National Guard Spc. Jason
Christopher Hartley, 31, of upstate New Paltz, who believes something
is lost as the grunt's-eye take on Tikrit or Kabul is silenced or
sanitized.
Hartley last January was among the first active-duty
combat troops demoted and fined for security violations on his blog,
justanothersoldier.com.
Throughout last year, the Army, Marines, Air Force
and Navy tightened control on bloggers by requiring them to register
through the chain of command and by creating special security squads to
monitor milblogs.
"The ones that stay up are completely patriotic and
innocuous, and they're fine if you want to read the flag-waving and how
everything's peachy keen in Iraq," said Hartley, who is back in New
Paltz after two years stationed in Iraq.
The new emphasis on security, however, is welcome to some.
"When you put your blog out there, you cannot forget
that not only the good guys, but the bad guys are accessing it,
especially for TTPs," said Marine Capt. Don Caetano, of Mineola,
referring to techniques, tactics and procedures. Now a recruiter in
Garden City, Caetano was stationed in Fallujah, where he ran the
embedded journalist program.
"The limitations on blogging basically mean, 'Don't
make it easy for them. Don't readily give up information,' " that would
endanger U.S. troops, Caetano said.
Revealing a minor aspect of strategy or tactics may
seem insignificant, Caetano said, but, "If the bad guys take a piece
from me, and a piece from you, and a piece from another guy, pretty
soon they can gather some pretty good intel."
The military, at first unaware of the milblogging
trend, last year began targeting bloggers with warnings, punctuated by
high-profile disciplinary action.
The Army chief of staff, Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker,
in August sent a videotaped admonition to overseas troops warning them
of the dangers of carelessness on blogs.
And, echoing the World War II censorship slogan,
"Loose lips sink ships," the Pentagon in November sent out an advisory
titled "Loose blogs may blow up BCTs." A BCT is a brigade combat team.
Hartley was fined $1,000 and demoted from sergeant.
Others also have been disciplined, including Pfc. Leonard Clark, an
Arizona national guardsman serving in Iraq who was demoted from
specialist and fined $1,640 in August for putting classified
information on his blog.
'That's Sorta the Point'
Among security breaches in postings on soldiers' Web
sites, the Army pointed to photos of an Abrams tank pierced by a
rocket-propelled grenade, which could show Iraqi insurgents where to
aim.
In Hartley's case, the Army said he should not have
described his unit's flight route into Iraq because that could help the
enemy shoot down U.S. aircraft. And, the Army said, Hartley should not
have disclosed that the last three bullets he loaded into his weapon's
magazine were always tracers, because that could tip an enemy to time
an attack just as an American soldier is reloading.
Despite those charges, Hartley asserts he did not
put any American troops at risk. He believes the Army's real concern
was his satiric tone.
"Photos of the week of cute Iraqi kids who I want to
shoot," he captioned one set of snapshots on his blog in 2004.
"Something I cannot reiterate often enough is how
monumentally misbehaved Iraqi street kids are," Hartley's blog
continued. "But some of them are just so darn cute, you can't help but
want to squeeze their little faces - until they suffocate."
The Army took him literally, even though Hartley
said he was aiming his satire at those who believe Iraqi civilians'
lives have little value.
Some of Hartley's readers got the point. Others did not.
One of Hartley's Web entries on April 24, 2004,
carried a photograph of an Iraqi man's partially burned corpse clothed
in a bloodied white tunic. Hartley's photo caption was a take on the "I
[heart] New York City" slogan. His version: "I [heart] Dead Civilians."
In response, a visitor wrote: "Is this a joke or what? This whole blogg gives a bad taste in the mouth."
Hartley replied, "It leaves a bad taste in your mouth? That's sorta the point."
Another blog reader, with the moniker Alberto,
defended the shock-blog: "The point of being so graphic it's to see
what a war really is. Good blog, keep it up!"
In general, observers say, soldiers' online musings are less and less compelling.
There's less of the informal, often coarse language
- one soldier speaking to another - that gave a feeling of authenticity
and attracted thousands of readers both in and out of the military,
said Jon Peede, director of Operation Homecoming, a National Endowment
for the Arts program that gives writing instruction to U.S. troops and
is creating a collection of their blogs, letters and essays.
Yet one drawback to vivid, uncensored descriptions
of combat on blogs was that the family of a wounded or killed soldier
might get the news impersonally, or worry unnecessarily, Peede said.
"A blogger might say, 'We were in a firefight in a
particular city, and a fellow Marine was wounded,' " Peede said, "and
then 50 families might read that and think it's their son or brother."
Content Concerns
Besides, wayward milblogs give the world a skewed
view of U.S. troops, said Capt. Dan Rice, of Manhattan, who served in
Tikrit for 18 months with the U.S. Army National Guard's 42nd Infantry
Division. A West Point graduate, Rice served as a finance officer and
is now back working as a vice president at the U.S. Trust Co. of New
York.
Most bloggers are atypical soldiers, said Rice, who
wrote a pro-military blog favored by his superior officers. "It will
mostly be the risk-takers, the mavericks, and the one percent that's
bitter, who will blog."
Readers also have taken up the debate.
"my only concern is the posting of troopers pics and
info ... the jihadist moniter [sic] these blogs too," a visitor to
adayiniraq.com wrote.
"these troops may have been compromised by these
blogs," the visitor wrote. "i for one would rather have no blogs about
our troopers if it needlessly endanger's 1 of thier [sic] lives."
Marine Cpl. Al Maldonado, 28, of West Hempstead, who
saw combat in Iraq, said milblogs help maintain a connection between
the troops and their friends, family and community back home. During
weeks of supplying tons of ammunition to Marines in Fallujah in
November, his family was cheered to find a humorous photo of him on a
blog, Maldonado said.
Blogs also allow soldiers to simply describe their
combat experiences, without feeling they are bragging, Maldonado said.
"Sometimes they want to tell everyone what they went
through because they're afraid that when they go back, they won't be
appreciated for what they've done," he said.
Maldonado, an ammo chief, criticized Hartley for
blogging about the reloading technique. "To describe your method for
loading tracers in a blog, that's pretty stupid. Now I know when three
tracers go by me that's when he's reloading," he said.
A Waste of Time?
Seymour Hersh, the reporter who broke stories on the
My Lai Massacre during the Vietnam War and torture at Abu Ghraib prison
outside Baghdad, said military commanders can't control the flow of
information by shutting down soldiers' blogs.
"There's a tremendous communication underground.
[Soldiers] talk, they send e-mails, photos," Hersh said from his
Washington, D.C., office. "The Army is wasting its time."
Milblogs remain popular. mudvillegazette.com claimed
more than 700,000 page views in 2005, with blackfive.net not far
behind. And michaelyon.blogspot is ranked in the top 100 (No. 81) of
the 8 million blogs tracked by Technorati.com.
But with stricter controls now in place, the milblogosphere's freewheeling days likely are limited.
Some critics of the censorship say it could be
harder for American soldiers to publicly raise questions about the U.S.
invasion of Iraq, the success or failure of the war effort, and the
"stop-loss" policy that forces soldiers to remain after enlistment
contracts expire.
But a complete milblog blackout may never succeed.
"Is it over? No way, as long as there are soldiers
and the Internet. People will always be starting blogs and get shut
down, and then someone else starts one," Hartley said. "In my
generation, or younger, everyone's all about spilling their guts on the
Internet."
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|