|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
Anthrax Vaccinations to Resume
Associated Press
October 17, 2006
WASHINGTON
- The Pentagon said Monday it will once again begin requiring anthrax
vaccinations for troops heading into dangerous regions, reinstating a
program that has been challenged repeatedly over possible health risks.
Dr. William Winkenwerder Jr., the assistant secretary of defense for
health affairs, said the vaccinations will begin in 30 to 60 days, and
will involve troops and civilian Defense Department personnel and
contractors who are serving in the Middle East, Central Asia and the
Korean Peninsula.
"This is a safe and effective vaccine," Winkenwerder said in a
conference call with reporters. He said the move to reinstate the
vaccine does not suggest there is any new or elevated threat but the
possibility of an anthrax attack is "very real and it has not gone
away."
Opponents of the program promised a fresh challenge. Mark S. Zaid, one
of the lawyers who previously sued to stop the mandatory program, said
he would file a new lawsuit "as soon as needles start going into arms."
Other groups who have opposed the program also criticized the new
requirements.
"This is a vaccine that is unproven, unnecessary and has the potential
to jeopardize the health of a service member where little benefit will
be derived," Zaid said. "It's always been a public relations program
and nothing more."
He questioned why the Pentagon is inoculating troops in the Middle East
when the 2001 anthrax attacks that left five people dead and sickened
17 took place in the United States.
Winkenwerder said the vaccine has been thoroughly reviewed by the
federal Food and Drug Administration and several independent groups and
deemed safe.
He said anyone who refused the vaccine would be reminded of its
importance and safety. Then, if needed, their supervisor would get
involved and the matter would be resolved "like any other refusal to
follow a lawful order."
He said that while significant numbers of troops refused the vaccine in
1998-99, very few have objected to taking it since then. About 10
people were discharged for refusing the vaccine in 2004, but he said he
did not know how many may have refused and gotten other punishments. He
was unsure what would happen if a civilian employee or contractor
refused the vaccine.
The drug has been at the center of a multiyear lawsuit that began when
six members of the military challenged the mandatory vaccination
program.
Since 1998, at least 1.2 million troops have been vaccinated against
anthrax in six-shot regimens. Hundreds of service members had been
punished or discharged for refusing them until U.S. District Judge
Emmet Sullivan in December 2004 suspended the vaccinations after he
found fault in the FDA's process for approving the drug.
Several months later Sullivan said the Pentagon could resume
vaccinations on a voluntary basis. Then, last December the FDA affirmed
its earlier finding that the vaccine was safe and effective.
According to Winkenwerder, there is enough vaccine to inoculate the
several hundred thousand troops that will be deploying to Iraq,
Afghanistan and other dangerous locations.
Pentagon officials are also working with the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention to determine if at least one of the six initial
shots can be eliminated. The vaccine also requires an annual booster
shot.
Other groups questioned the vaccine's safety.
"The (Defense Department) has a moral duty to fully disclose anthrax
vaccine risks, as well as benefits, to Soldiers and allow them to make
an informed, voluntary vaccination decision," said Barbara Loe Fisher,
president of the nonprofit National Vaccine Information Center.
The center has launched the Military and Biodefense Vaccine Project to
inform the public and service members about potential illnesses,
disabilities and deaths that may be associated with the vaccine.
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|