|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
Military’s Discharges for Being Gay Rose in ’05
JOHN FILES, New York Times
August 15, 2006
WASHINGTON,
Aug. 14 — The Defense Department discharged 726 service members
last year for being gay, up about 10 percent from 2004, figures
released by a gay rights group show.
The group, the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, obtained the
information through a Freedom of Information Act request. A spokeswoman
for the Defense Department, Lt. Col. Ellen Krenke, confirmed that it
had released the information.
On Monday, the legal group released a breakdown of discharges by
installation. A sharp increase occurred at Fort Campbell, Ky., where in
1999 a soldier was bludgeoned to death in his barracks by fellow
soldiers who thought he was homosexual. In 2004, 19 service members
from the base were discharged, a number that climbed to 49 last year.
Fort Sill, Okla., had 27 dismissals last year, up from 8 in 2004. Fort
Leonard Wood, Mo., had 60 dismissals, up from 40 in 2004, and the
Marine base at Parris Island, S.C., discharged 22, up from 12.
The Army, by far the largest branch of the military, discharged more
gay personnel last year than the other branches with 386, the figures
show, followed by the Navy with 177, the Air Force with 88 and the
Marines, the smallest force, with 75.
The overall number of men and women dismissed because they were found
to be gay or because they disclosed their sexuality fell in the three
years from 2002 to 2004. From Sept. 11, 2001, through last year, the
discharge rate dropped 40 percent.
The total of such discharges in 2004 was 653. That compares with 770 in 2003, 885 in 2002 and 1,227 in 2001.
Under a policy introduced by the Clinton administration known as
“don’t ask, don’t tell,” the military cannot
inquire into service members’ sex lives unless there is evidence
of homosexual conduct.
Those who volunteer the information have to be discharged. More than
11,000 members have been discharged for that reason, the legal group
said.
In a review by the Government Accountability Office, an investigative
arm of Congress, the Pentagon said last year that more service members
had been discharged for drug offenses, pregnancy and weight problems
than for being gay.
Colonel Krenke said: “The Department of Defense policy on
homosexual conduct in the military implements a federal law enacted in
1993 following extensive hearings and debate. The law would need to be
changed to affect the department’s policy.”
The military has argued that allowing openly gay troops would disrupt
unit cohesion and undermine the services’ missions. Defense
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has said that the Bush administration will
not revisit the policy.
Representative Martin T. Meehan of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat
on the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Terrorism, Unconventional
Threats and Capabilities, introduced a bill last year to repeal the
policy on gay service members.
In an interview on Monday, Mr. Meehan pointed to “the seamless
integration of openly gay service members into the militaries of many
of our closest allies, namely the United Kingdom, Australia and
Israel.” His bill has 118 supporters, including 5 Republicans.
A spokesman for the legal group, Steve Ralls, said it had detected no
increased effort to oust members under the policy last year. Mr. Ralls
said that some bases reporting increases in discharges had few, if any,
reports of unchecked harassment. It often boils down to the tolerance
of individual commanders, he said.
“In the end,” Mr. Ralls said, “we just don’t know what exactly led to these dismissals.”
Some service members have used the policy to escape their military
obligations as morale has dipped and multiple overseas deployments have
caused strain, Mr. Ralls added.
The legal group has also seen an increase in the malicious use of the
Internet and e-mail to disclose the sexual orientation of service
members, Mr. Ralls said. Sites like MySpace.com are routinely visited
by service members and military officials, and service members who
identify themselves as gay or lesbian on the Internet risk expulsion.
In one case, the orientation of a gay sergeant was disclosed to his
superiors by anonymous e-mail messages. The sergeant was honorably
discharged this year from the Army.
Lizette Alvarez contributed reporting from New York for this article.
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|