|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
A struggle over military recruitment of students
Tom Regan, csmonitor.com
December 28, 2005
In Ohio,
the Dayton Daily News reported Tuesday that in one school district,
more than 1500 parents signed the opt-out forms after a parent
convinced the local school district to more actively notify parents of
their options. Yet at other schools in the same area, not a single
parent decided to use the opt-out provision.
Much of the dispute over recruitment revolves around a provision of the
"No Child Left Behind" act, which stipulates that any school receiving
federal funds must give the military information on high school juniors
and seniors. The act says that high schools must notify parents that
they can make a request to to prevent military recruiters from
obtaining their children’s contact information.
But that notification does not have to be made individually, according
to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act – the
notification can be included in a mailing, student handbook, or another
method that is "reasonably calculated to inform parents." In several
states, parents of high school children are pressuring their school
boards to do a better job of letting parents know that they have this
option.
The Canyon Courier of Evergreen, Colorado, late last month reported on
how parent Richard Waltzman, a military veteran and antiwar protestor,
prodded the local school board to make a change in its notification
policy. Previously, administrators sent letters about the policy home
with students. Now the board has begun mailing parents of high school
juniors a copy of the rules about recruiting and an opt-out form. It
will also hand out the same materials to parents each fall at school
registration.
District Superintendent Cindy Stevenson said that although the
district’s previous procedure was legal and "exceeded best
practice," community members prompted the change.
"We responded to a segment of the community that wanted to make sure
these letters got home," Stevenson said. "It wasn’t a response to
all of the community, but to a segment of the community."
The Illinois Association of School Boards recently decided to push for
a change in federal law "so parents don't have to write a letter to
keep high schools from sharing their teens' contact information with
military recruiters." The group says it would prefer to see the system
work the opposite way - that parents who are interested in a military
career for their children can notify the school district.
The Lexington Herald-Leader of Kentucky reported Tuesday that while
many people in the state support the military's recruitment policies,
more than a few parents express concern about some of the tactics
recruiters use. School districts in the area are also considering more
active notification of parents about their right to opt-out.
Writing in The American Enterprise Online, Brooks Tucker, a major in
the Marine Corps Reserve and a Wall Street financial advisor, blames
recent problems with military recruiting partially on "antiwar factions
within public schools."
These instances still aren’t prevalent enough to deter recruiters
from their overall mission, but they do have a somewhat demoralizing
effect on an already over-stressed recruiting force. And they’re
certainly not what should be expected from educators tasked with
providing our young people with an education rather than a politically
motivated message.
The school administrators, teachers, and counselors who engage in these
opposition activities know that formally obstructing military
recruitment in their schools would cause unwanted legal scrutiny from
the federal government. So, in an effort to adhere to the letter of the
law and avoid legal action, they choose unobtrusive ways to have their
voices heard in the hope that they can score some minor political
points and influence military recruiting. This type of political
activity is a blatant disregard of congressional intent, and makes it
much more difficult for a young man or woman who is attracted to the
military to get a fair and balanced perspective on the risks and
benefits of a military career.
But parent John Schneider, writing last week in The Baltimore Sun,
points out that "regardless of one's position on the Iraq war, few
parents would feel that they do not belong in all relevant discussions
of their child's welfare and future." He writes that even the military
has had some questions about some recruiters' tactics, holding a
one-day recruiting moratorium last spring to address "misconduct by
recruiters." Mr. Schneider also says he was dismayed by the lack of
knowledge many school administrators in his area of Maryland had about
the opt-out program.
But Schneider writes that he is most concerned by the June 23 admission
of the Pentagon that it "had created a database containing information
on millions of high school and college students ages 16 to 25."
Schneider says that "this database was created without the requisite
announcement and public comment period required by the 1974 Privacy
Act."
The Lexington Herald-Tribune reported Tuesday on one of the primary
tools that the military has to create this database, the Armed Services
Vocational Aptitude Battery (or the ASVAB).
The ASVAB ... is a standardized test, prepared by the military, that is
given annually to many high school juniors and seniors across Kentucky
and the rest of the country. By one estimate, near 1 million US high
school students took the test last year.
Scores on the ASVAB can help students assess their potential for
various kinds of careers. But the test has also been controversial in
some places because it gauges students' suitability for various
military jobs, and recruiters often use test scores in selecting
students to contact about signing up.
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|