|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
$40,000 found to be misused; recruiters demoted, punished
Matthew Dolan, Baltimore Sun
February 23, 2007
The Maryland National Guard's top general has stripped his senior Army
recruiter of his command and disciplined 13 additional soldiers after
an internal investigation found members of the recruiting battalion
misappropriated $40,000 in training funds and, in at least two cases,
signed up soldiers who were ineligible to serve.
Officials said Friday that the accusations of impropriety in recruiting
efforts were first raised in December. The Guard launched an internal
investigation immediately, but found little to substantiate the initial
allegations involving the mistreatment of new recruits, according to
Guard spokesman 1st Lt. Wayde Minami.
But as more accusations poured in, including fraternization between
officers and enlisted personnel, the Guard quickly launched a second
investigation. The lieutenant colonel in charge of that probe found
merit in some of those claims and discovered additional wrongdoing
independently.
"It saddens and disappoints me to report that while many of the
allegations were unsubstantiated, a number of improprieties were
uncovered," Major General Bruce F. Tuxill, the head of the Maryland
National Guard, wrote in an e-mail Friday to the roughly 7,000 members.
The violations included soldiers who were supposed to take leave to
attend training, but instead spent at least part of the time doing
something else, Minami said. The spokesman would not describe in detail
what other activities the soldiers did, but said that they would now be
responsible for reimbursing the Guard $40,000 for improperly filed
travel expenses.
The investigative report, which has not been publicly released, made
recommendations that included the option of lodging criminal charges
against soldiers, Minami said. Tuxill, the state's adjutant general,
instead chose to mete out administrative punishments.
In addition to removing Maj. Travis Rambert from his post overseeing
the 100-member recruiting operation, Tuxill ordered letters of
reprimand for seven others and moved 10 of the 13 soldiers out of the
recruiting battalion altogether. One non-commissioned officer was
demoted and discharged from the Guard.
Most of the punished Guardsmen worked at the Fifth Regiment Armory in
Baltimore and the armory in Ellicott City. Rambert took over the
battalion in October.
When asked why more Guardsmen weren't fired or anyone charged
criminally, Tuxill said in an interview Friday that he believed the
accused soldiers would be able to beat any charges lodged against them.
"We feel very strongly that administratively, I can do more than
getting in a fistfight. Administrative remedies are much more
effective," the general said.
His spokesman said in a separate interview that "when you kick them
out, that's a whole order of magnitude different from being fired from
a civilian job." Minami added that the loss of command and reprimand
letters are sufficient and "will have a negative effect on their
careers."
The Guard defended its overall recruiting operation, saying that its
goals have been met and even exceeded in some cases. Corruption among
recruiters, Tuxill said, was not systemic.
"The scope here is less than 10 percent of our total recruiting force," the general said.
But Minami also said the Guard's ability to attract new soldiers and retain the ones it has could be affected.
"It may have a short-term impact as the organization is going through a
very traumatic experience," he said. "In the long term, it's only going
help to recruit and retain people. It shows that we had these problems
and we've taken care of it. It shows that we have integrity, that we're
going to do the right thing.
"We don't cover things up in the Maryland National Guard. We take care of it."
Top officials blamed the problems in large part on the ability of
soldiers to stay within the recruiting division for almost their entire
careers. That practice will now end.
"There was a culture that had grown up that allowed these types of
problems to happen." Minami said. "By having a constant flow of fresh
blood in the recruiting battalion in the future, that won't happen
again."
Rick Abbruzzese, spokesman for Gov. Martin O'Malley, said the governor
and his senior staff were briefed two days ago about the investigation.
"The governor is confident that the National Guard is taking all of the corrective action necessary," Abbruzzese said.
He declined to comment whether the investigation would imperil the
future of Tuxill, whose post is a gubernatorial appointment. Only a
fraction -- 4 percent in 2006 -- of the $300 million budget for the
Maryland Military Department, which includes the Guard, comes from
state coffers; the rest is funded by the federal government.
The pressure to sign up new troops and keep them in uniform in the
midst of two wars has been constant for the military since Sept. 11,
2001.
An August report from the Government Accounting Office found that from
2004 to 2005, allegations of "recruiter wrongdoing" increased
nationwide from 4,400 cases to 6,600 cases. The number of substantiated
cases also rose from just over 400 to almost 630 cases. And the number
of criminal violations related to military recruiting more than doubled
from just over 30 to almost 70 cases.
"The department, however, is not in a sound position to assure Congress
and the general public that it knows the full extent to which recruiter
irregularities are occurring," the GAO concluded in its report.
A number of factors within the recruiting environment may contribute to
irregularities, according to the GAO. Investigators said recruiters
mentioned the strength of the economy and ongoing hostilities in Iraq
as factors that made it more difficult for them to achieve their goals
using lawful means.
Largely absent from the watchdog report was mention of the National
Guard's part-time soldiers, many of whom have been called up for
multiple tours in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In a footnote in the report, the GAO found that "the National Guard
Bureau does not maintain data on allegations and service-identified
incidents of recruiter irregularities. "
U.S. Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, a Baltimore Democrat, said he was pleased
by the release of the investigation but disappointed by the Guard's
leadership over recruiting.
"I am deeply troubled that the National Guard does not appear to have
been aware of the extent of unprofessional behavior and the failures of
leadership -- even apparently by a recruiter named as 'Recruiter of the
Year' -- within its recruiting operations until allegations were
reported in local media," Cummings said in a statement.
The Guard's leadership promoted the release of the investigation' s
findings Friday as evidence of how serious they are about misconduct
within their ranks. But the Baltimore City Paper first reported
problems with the Guard's recruiting operation in December. Readers
soon flooded the paper's Web site with additional allegations.
The initial article focused on the Guard's recruiter of the year, Sgt.
1st Class Richard F. Thomas, and allegations of sexual impropriety and
of an altercation with a co-worker. Because Guard officials declined to
release the names of those investigated, it was unclear Friday whether
Thomas was among those disciplined.
According to Cummings, the scandal signaled more serious problems inside the Maryland National Guard.
"While the commander of recruiting operations has now been relieved of
his duties, I believe that the senior leadership of the Maryland Army
National Guard should have acted to intervene in these matters,
particularly as they appear to involve a large number of recruiting
personnel, before they became the subject of newspaper reports," the
congressman said.
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|