|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
Stepped-up Army recruiting enlists many with problems
Bryan Bender, Boston Globe
November 27, 2007
WASHINGTON - Two weeks ago, the Pentagon announced the "good news"
that the Army had met its recruiting goal for October, the first
month in a five-year plan to add 65,000 new soldiers to the ranks by 2012.
But Pentagon statistics show the Army met that goal by accepting a
higher percentage of enlistees with criminal records, drug or alcohol
problems, or health conditions that would have ordinarily
disqualified them from service.
In each fiscal year since the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003,
statisics show, the Army has accepted a growing percentage of
recruits who do not meet its own minimum fitness standards. The
October statistics show that at least 1 of every 5 recruits required
a waiver to join the service, leading military analysts to conclude
that the Army is lowering standards more than it has in decades.
"The across-the-board lowering of the standards is buying problems in
the future," said John D. Hutson, a retired rear admiral, dean of the
Franklin Pierce Law Center, and a former judge advocate general of
the Navy. "You are going to have more people getting in trouble, more
people washing out" of the service before finishing their tour of duty.
The Army Recruiting Command, based in Fort Knox, Ky., insists that it
carefully reviews each applicant. "We look at the recent history,
such as employment, schooling, references, and signs of remorse and
changed behavior since the incident occurred" on how recruits with
criminal records are regarded, the command said in a statement to the Globe.
But Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat and influential chairman
of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said he is concerned that the
the Army is sacrificing quality for quantity.
"While quantity is of course important, quality must remain the
highest priority," Levin said at a Nov. 15 congressional hearing.
"The Army must continue to uphold high standards - moral,
intellectual, and physical - for new recruits, to ensure that these
young men and women are capable of handling the great demands that
they will face . . . We must find a way to both increase the size of
the Army and to maintain its standards."
Anxious to reduce the strain the Iraq war has placed on ground
forces, Congress earlier this year approved the Pentagon's proposal
to bring the active-duty Army to at least 547,000 troops, an increase
of 65,000 and the biggest buildup of conventional forces since the
end of the Cold War. The plan is predicted to cost as much as $70 billion.
Army leaders say they are on pace to complete the expansion two years
early by beefing up recruiting efforts and offering mid-level
officers and enlisted soldiers bonuses of up to $35,000 if they reenlist.
But the recruiting data for October show that accepting applicants
who would previously have been disqualified is likely to be a key way
of reaching the numbers, according to Hutson and a military
recruiting analyst. Of the 6,434 enlistees who signed up last month,
792, or 12.3 percent, required waivers for past criminal activity
that would have disqualified them, including misdemeanor and felony
convictions, according to Army data.
By comparison, 11.2 percent of Army recruits were granted criminal
waivers in all of fiscal year 2007, which ended Sept. 30. The 2007
figure was the largest percentage of recruits admitted on waivers
since the Iraq war began.
Because the Army has used different methods to track waivers, no one
can say for sure if the current percentages are records. But
recruiting officials believe that the percentage of recruits admitted
on waivers is the highest the Army has seen in recent decades.
The data, which include active-duty soldiers as well as Army
reservists, show that the percentage of waivers for recruits with
criminal records more than doubled in the past few years, from 4.6
percent in 2003 to 11.2 percent in 2007.
Those "moral character waivers" must be approved by an officer the
rank of lieutenant colonel or higher. The waivers are required when
an Army applicant has been convicted of committing four or more
"minor offenses" such as littering or disorderly conduct, or two to
four misdemeanors such as larcency, trespassing, or vandalism.
Recruits who have committed a felony such as arson, burglary, or
aggravated assault must also receive a moral waiver to join.
Applicants with multiple felonies - or with a single conviction for a
more serious crime such as homicide, rape, or drug trafficking - are
automatically disqualified.
The share of new recruits granted waivers for medical reasons, such
as failing Army physical fitness standards or for testing positive
for marijuana or cocaine use, has also soared in the past five years.
The percentage of medical waivers more than doubled, from 4.1 percent
in 2003 to 8.6 percent last month. Drug or alcohol abuse waivers
increased by half, from 1 percent in 2003 to 1.5 percent last month.
Medical waivers can be granted for a host of physical deficiencies,
including being overweight - as long as the condition is not
progressive, will not be aggravated by military service, will not
impede a recruit's ability to train, and will not jeopardize comrades' safety.
Drug and alcohol waivers are granted by the head of the recruiting
command to applicants who test positive for marijuana no more than
twice and cocaine no more than once in tests given during the
recruiting process.
Although the Army has pledged to accept only quality recruits,
military analysts predict the percentage of recruits admitted on
waivers will keep rising with the demand for more soldiers.
Recruiters "have a tough year ahead of them," said Beth Asch, an
economist at the government-funded Rand Corporation who specializes
in military recruiting issues.
Asch believes that despite the Army's assurances, an independent body
should "spot-check" the waiver approval process to make sure each
recruit has been rehabilitated or is otherwise of high caliber. "I
think it needs to be monitored carefully," she said.
But Hutson worries that lower standards "may be the only way we can
grow the force."
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|