|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
Army's Recruiting Goal Lags For Second Month in a Row
Josh White, Washington Post
July 10, 2007
The U.S. Army fell short of its active-duty recruiting goal for June by
about 15 percent, defense officials said yesterday. It is the second
consecutive month the service's enlistment effort has faltered amid the
American public's growing discontent over the war in Iraq.
Army officials confirmed yesterday that the service missed its June
target -- the first time its recruiters have missed their monthly mark
twice in a row since they were hit hard in 2005 -- but declined to
discuss specific numbers before a scheduled release today. Three
defense officials said the Army fell short by about 1,400 soldiers,
well shy of its goal of 8,400 for June.
Because recruiters consistently exceeded their targets throughout the
first half of fiscal 2007, the Army still remains above its
year-to-date goal by about 700 recruits.
July, August and September are traditionally the best months for
military recruiters, and this year the Army hopes to take in more than
a third of its expected 80,000 new recruits in that period. According
to Army recruiting statistics, the service aims for 28,850 new soldiers
between now and the end of the fiscal year in September -- an average
of more than 9,600 each month.
"To date, we're still ahead for the year," said Col. Dan Baggio, an
Army spokesman at the Pentagon. "Obviously, we're concerned, but we're
not panicking. We are ahead for the year, and we're just going to have
to work hard to make our numbers."
The Army has met its recruiting numbers in the past two years by
mobilizing a larger force of recruiters, offering higher incentives to
join and broadening its potential pool by offering waivers -- for
physical conditions and violating the law -- to people who normally
would not qualify.
Mirroring concerns in 2005, when the Army fell thousands short of its
monthly goals during much of the year, defense officials said that a
good economy and lack of encouragement for military service from
parents, coaches and other "influencers" have caused the recruiting
slump. The Iraq war's sharp decline in popularity has also made
recruiting far more difficult, as many recruits almost certainly will
deploy to the battlefield.
"If you don't think that's affecting the influencers, then you have
your head under a rock," said one Pentagon official who spoke on the
condition of anonymity because the June numbers have not yet been
released.
Pentagon officials acknowledge that the coming months will be
challenging because the potential recruit market is difficult and they
did not anticipate the Army's total slipping as much as it did in June.
Service officials, however, are encouraged by steady retention rates in
the active-duty Army and the Army Reserve and point to successes
earlier in the year as evidence that the numbers can recover this
summer. The Army recruited 9,309 new soldiers in January, nearly 1,000
more than its goal.
Edwin Dorn, a former undersecretary of defense for personnel and
readiness who is now with the University of Texas, said the Army has
always had more trouble recruiting than other services, and he noted
that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan make it far harder.
"To me, the big surprise is that Army recruiting has remained as
healthy as it has been, given the growing unpopularity of the Iraq
war," Dorn said. "The mystery is not why they are falling short; to me,
it's how they have succeeded as well."
Staff writer Ann Scott Tyson contributed to this report.
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|