|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
The U.S. Military Gets Old-school in Your Kids' Schools
J.F. Pirro, Philadelphia City Paper
May 18, 2006
As a freshman, Roxborough High's Denisha Williams wore a green uniform,
shiny black shoes and an Army-issued hat every Thursday. Now a senior,
she says the "academic credit" is what attracted her to the school's
Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps course. Then she realized she
was too "peaceful a person."
There were 32 members in her freshman JROTC class, "a time when they
catch a lot of them," she says. Overall, 68 Roxborough High freshman
joined JROTC that year; as seniors, 15 remain.
Having since dropped out of JROTC and opted out of sharing her personal
contact information with military recruiters, all Williams gets for
that one year in JROTC is unwanted attention. She's now learning that
she traded in a salute for a senior year of solicitation.
"I have received phone calls, e-mail, three letters and a 15-minute
videotape," she says. "I even received a phone call from a female
recruiter asking if I was still interested in the Navy. I told her I
wasn't and hung up. A week later, I received another letter and the
tape. I threw them in the trash."
As the war in Iraq rages on and military recruiters scramble to fill
thinning ranks, Philadelphia school district upperclassmen like
Williams have increasingly been targeted as potential soldiers.
Though the district denies such a trend—even as a 2004 national
survey ranked Philadelphia County as the nation's ninth biggest
producer of black Army recruits—local opponents of militarism say
it's time they own up to reality.
Next year, there will be 17 city schools with a military
presence—possibly 19, if two more get the vote of approval from
the School Reform Commission. In 2002, there were eight.
Capt. Daniel R. Gager, U.S. Army commander of the South Philadelphia
Recruiting Company, says an explicit verbal directive, which has since
become part of a written plan, was sent from the U.S. Recruiting
Command to all company commanders six months ago. It ordered them to
increase the focus on high school upperclassmen.
In its own studies, the Army learned it wasn't securing a sufficient
percentage of recruits as compared to the other armed services. Gager,
who used to focus efforts on high school and college graduates, has
been charged with recruiting "50 percent of all the high school
students enlisting into the armed services."
Still, this is news to school district CEO Paul Vallas, who says, "I don't know anything about it."
For some, enlisting in the military is a viable option. For others, the
recruiting war, which according to the White House Office of Management
and Budget costs the Pentagon nearly $3 billion a year, is vicious.
In one camp, the school district doggedly maintains it's providing
opportunities, not prepping cadets for combat. JROTC, it says, has
"zero" to do with war, military training or recruiting. The district,
he adds, doesn't allow weapon demonstration or training, and doesn't
permit military recruiters in its military schools. He stresses
the district has a Project Peace club in 60 elementary schools.
JROTC is a voluntary, credited course at schools like Roxborough.
Students apply to Philadelphia Military Academy at Leeds School in Mt.
Airy, a two-year school with 236 freshmen and sophomores, and to North
Philly's first-year Philadelphia Military Academy at Elverson, which
houses 106 freshmen. Attendance and test scores are on the uptick,
district officials say, while disciplinary rates are decreasing.
However, militarism opponents like the Central Committee for
Conscientious Objectors (CCCO) and American Friends Service Committee
(AFSC) say "boot-camp methodology" discourages critical thought,
encourages blind inculcation and chases the economically
disenfranchised, inner-city minorities with fewer options after high
school. Military billboards sprout up in their neighborhoods with
disproportionate frequency.
These foes maintain the district is playing into the military's hands.
Nationally, of the top 50 high schools ranked by black recruits, 47
have at least one JROTC program, according to the National Priorities
Project (NPP), a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that examines the
impact federal policies have on local communities. Though NPP ranked
Philadelphia in the top 10 for black recruits with 107, it was 28th for
overall recruits, with 247.
Lt. Col. Russell A. Gallagher, the district's JROTC director, doesn't entirely deny the demographic realities.
"JROTC gets into large cities that are cash-strapped because the people
there are looking for programs that provide options," he says. "Is that
"targeting'? No. Is it serving a population that needs it? Yes."
On its Web site, CCCO, which has an office at 1515 Cherry St., calls
JROTC "too controversial, too likely to promote violence, too
expensive, too controlled by Washington, too discriminatory and
too much at odds with the goal of creating critically-thinking students
in gun-free schools."
"JROTC is a program of the military, by the military, and for the
military," they maintain. "Disguised as an education program, JROTC is
a Trojan horse the military uses to gain access to schools and
potential recruits."
Oskar Castro, coordinator of the National Youth and Militarism Program
in AFSC's Philadelphia office, says city students, especially younger
ones, are registered for JROTC against their will. Then they don't know
how or when to drop the class.
Gallagher says JROTCs aren't supposed to be dumping grounds, and if a
kid wants out, he can get out in any time period "within reason." He
says situations are handled on a case-by-case basis. However, he
admits, "After six months, if someone doesn't like it, there's nowhere
else to go."
Castro maintains these "tricks and games" allow schools to
maintain Pentagon-required JROTC enrollment (at least 10 percent
of the host institution's population).
"It's an indoctrination tool," he says. "How can you have such an
institutional bias operating in your schools? Young people are buying
the dog-and-pony show, and getting into JROTC because it's "the
American thing to do.' A community embraces it, too, if it "keeps kids
off the streets.'"
As a means of defense, students and their parents have a single clause
in the 2001 federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation. It lets
them opt out of having their contact information shared with recruiters.
Otherwise, Section 9528 of NCLB requires public high schools to release
the information, or they'll lose federal funding. The little-known
provision was slipped in long before anyone figured out what it meant.
Now, without opting out—and even if you do, according to
some—phones are still ringing off the hook with a
telemarketer's temerity and a salesman's smothering.
Megan McDaniel, a Roxborough High senior who would like to be a
preschool teacher, calls recruiters "annoying." One male recruiter
offered to chauffeur her to his office.
"That was really kind of scary," she says. "The weird thing was that I not once said I wanted to join the military."
Recruiters endure a seven-week training program, but Gager says only 20
percent of those in his company who finish become successful. He's
responsible for eight recruiting stations, including those in South
Philly, West Philly, Center City and Upper Darby.
The most high school recruits he's had in any month in a year on the
job was five. His quota for the following month was 75, even though the
most he's had was 42.
"Even our veterans say combat is easier than recruiting," Gager says.
His biggest challenge is finding city kids who can pass the ASVAB, the
military aptitude test. Gager says one in six city kids pass—you
need a score of 31 out of 99—and if a student fails, he must wait
90 days to try again. Though the Army offers an online
tutorial—march2success.com—Gager says, "I've had kids take
it three times and not pass."
Both JROTC and AFSC were created in response to World War I. JROTC
began with the National Defense Act of 1916. Founded by Quakers in
1917, AFSC organizes worldwide social justice and peace programs. So
several wars later, who has the upper hand? "We're on a winning
curve [against recruitment]," Castro says, "but with the number of new
JROTCs, we're not winning."
Vallas, who spent 14 years in the reserves for the Illinois National
Guard, says "hogwash" to militarism critics. He reaffirms a concerted
plan that mirrors his reform of Chicago's schools before he came here.
(Chicago Military Academy-Bronzeville, the nation's first public
military school, graduated its first class in 2003.)
A moderate Democrat who once ran for governor of Illinois, Vallas doesn't hide his political persuasions.
"We're going to put [JROTC] in as many schools as want one and in as
many as we can get one in," he says. "I'm against the war in Iraq, too,
but don't take it out on JROTC programs. My goals are to graduate kids
and get them into colleges, not get them into the military. I've
increased the number of sports teams, too, so one could argue I'm
prepping our kids for the NFL and NBA, too."
In the fall, pending a School Reform Commission vote, Washington
High will begin an Air Force JROTC, and a third public military academy
will open in the former St. Leo's, a Catholic school that closed last
June in the city's Tacony neighborhood.
A typical JROTC program costs the school district of Philadelphia
approximately $97,500, according to the district. That covers half the
salaries of two teachers; the federal government picks up the other
half.
JROTC "has to do with gang avoidance, leadership, citizen training and
character development," says Gager, agreeing with Vallas that there's
no direct connection to the military. "They hate [President George W.]
Bush, they don't like war, and think we're putting people on planes to
Iraq."
Born and raised in the city, Gallagher, 53, graduated from Olney, then
Penn State. He flew helicopters for 21 years in the U.S. Army, then ran
a JROTC at Roxborough from 1995 to 2002 before Vallas created his
supervisory position. This year, he has overseen 2,500 students in 17
programs. By contrast, Chicago has 43 high school JROTCs and nearly
10,000 cadets.
At both Philly military academies, JROTC is an all-day, every-day
commitment. Cadets dress in full uniform. Three days a week, they have
classes. One day is for leadership training. Friday is for physical
training. At Roxborough or Frankford, JROTC is one period a day.
Students dress in uniform once a week.
And not every student finds it annoying like Williams and McDaniel do.
Cadet Major Eric L. Hairston, a Frankford senior, says the wrong crowd
nearly ruined him. He spent part of his freshman year at Cardinal
Dougherty, near his home in the city's Olney section. But that didn't
work out, so he tried Jules E. Mastbaum Technical High. That was worse.
He'd pick fights. He was a self-proclaimed juvenile delinquent.
Then, after transferring to Frankford in October of his junior
year, JROTC "transformed" him. His older brother Chris spent three
JROTC years there. Now, when Eric, an All-Public League linebacker,
graduates, he'll be second in command of his school's U.S. Army
battalion.
"I remember saying to myself, "I need a different path,'" Hairston
recalls. "Because of JROTC, I'm more disciplined. I've got my respect
up."
For next year, there were 2,000 military school applicants for 375
lottery-selected slots (125 new freshmen for each of three schools),
according to Vallas. Very few of the interested families, Gallagher
says, are interested in joining the military. Most simply want a safe,
challenging, structured environment.
That's what Jonathan Tomlin, a freshman class platoon sergeant at
Leeds, sought a year ago. He was the only cadet from Greenberg, his K-8
school in the Northeast.
"It's totally not about discipline," he says. "It's about
preparation for college and leadership preparation and training. It's
about academics—and if you're not getting good grades, they want
you out. A "C' is like a "F.'"
Every military prep student has a two-week summer training program, but Tomlin, 15, says it wasn't like boot camp at all.
"They made us do push-ups, but that's a given," he says. "They taught us how to march and get into formations."
But that's not for everyone. Neither is military recruiting.
Gallagher, who also coordinates the district's opt-out effort, which
was deemed "honor roll" worthy on www.leavemychildalone.org, says the
number of district students who opted out increased from about 3,000 to
4,000 this year. (Vallas says that's 20 percent of the district's
upperclassmen.) If a recruiter wants a copy of the "can-contact" list,
he must request it from Gallagher, who doesn't automatically
distribute it.
Part of coordinating is keeping recruiters in line, particularly when
they become "uppity or snotty," he says. "I tell them to wise up! At
times, I've asked them to go back and apologize [to students]."
Last September, the district mailed an opt-out form home to juniors and
seniors and waited three weeks for a response. A lack of response is
considered a non-objection, but those who opt out are flagged and put
on the equivalent of a no-call list.
The "can-contact" list was available by the end of October, but by then
recruiters were already dialing phone numbers from the previous year's
list, Gager says. A second-chance opt-out letter will be sent out by
the end of the month.
In a choreographed change, next year students will be able to opt out
as early as freshman orientation, Vallas says. He denies he's been
pressured, but says he wants to improve and increase
communication with parents on the issue.
But the opt-out form Roxborough's Denisha Williams signed "was a waste
of my time," she says. "They take that as a way to keep contacting you
in hopes you'll change your mind."
Gager has heard the complaints and concludes there are three reasons
recruiters contact opt-out households. Some districts are slower to
produce updated no-call lists each year, so recruiters use junior-year
lists, which may include current seniors who just opted out. (This,
even though the district says it's understanding is that a decision to
opt out is good until graduation unless otherwise changed.)
Secondly, there's no national "do not call" database, so the armed
forces do not share information. That means a student may receive
multiple calls from different branches. Finally, students and parents
do not communicate; students request information without telling their
parents, and parents opt out on their children's behalf without
discussing it.
"I would reprimand any recruiter that intentionally called someone who
asked not to be called," Gager says. "The problem is that we're just
one service and most people think of us as the "complete military' when
they're talking to [any one of] us.
"If we have the number, that usually means the Marine Corps, Air Force
and Navy has the number—as well as all of the reserves and the
National Guard in both New Jersey and Pennsylvania. This means someone
could get called as many as 10 times."
Walter DeShields, coordinator for the Gaining Early Awareness and
Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR-UP) at William Penn
High, a non-JROTC school, says recruiters average five or six visits a
year. Gager says that provides a chance "to tell the Army story."
Recruiters also schedule individual appointments by request. Students,
DeShields says, are noticeably less interested in the military this
year, his second since returning to work at his alma mater.
"More and more kids are getting the chills," he says. "They're saying,
"Can't you just tell him I'm not here today?' or, "Why don't they just
leave me alone?' I've definitely had some long, anxious conversations
about it."
What disturbs many is the perception that JROTC trains mostly minority
participants as privates, not officers. DeShields, who is black, says
he's bothered by the skewed percentages. Proportionately, there aren't
as many Air Force or Navy JROTCs, the "more prestigious" ones. Philly
will have 10 Army, six Air Force and one Navy (at Ben Franklin
High) JROTCs next year.
Both Philly academies are 72 percent black and 14 (Leeds) to 22 (Elverson) percent Latino, according to district figures.
"It's a great disparity," DeShields says. "It's like we're being used."
Wes Enzinna, a 2005 Temple University history grad, titled his senior
honors thesis "Discipline, Contradiction, and the Mis-Education of
Philadelphia: The African and African-American Curriculum in
Philadelphia High Schools and the Challenge of Junior ROTC, 1967-2005."
"The first thing one notices is that these programs target poor youth
of color despite their claims to the contrary," he says from South
America, where he's working as a social activist in Argentina and
Bolivia. "If this is such a great educational opportunity, why aren't
wealthy schools even considered for the program?"
While JROTCs existed in the city in the 1960s, Enzinna concluded from
what limited documentary evidence exists that they were mostly in
"white" schools, not predominantly black schools plagued by "frequent
and dramatic disturbances" and interracial violence.
Today, "JROTC is marketed as a [discipline] solution in these schools,"
says Enzinna, who visited four Philly JROTC schools while researching.
"Because JROTC is predicated on, as well as reproduces, such a negative
image of African-Americans, it stands in direct opposition to the
development of a positive African-American self-identity. It's a
perturbing hypocrisy."
Enzinna says while researching at one site he wouldn't name, he witnessed "what discipline means for your average ninth-grader."
"At all times in this school there is a "security' patrol of three
enormous men, roving the school looking for students who cause
trouble," he says. "The men grabbed a student who had cut class and
started questioning him. When the student gave them attitude, one of
the security guards grabbed the student, threw him into a corner
and held him there. His head was pushed into the wall. "You wanna fuck
with me?' the security guard said. "You want to fuck with me you little
pussy? You probably don't even have any hair on your balls. I'll fuck
you up so fast, you won't even know what happened.'"
JROTC supporters argue that the program is not designed to recruit
students into the military, but according to research by Catherine
Lutz, author of Homefront: A Military City and the American 20th
Century, about 40 percent of JROTC graduates say they plan to enter the
armed forces or reserves.
Frankford's Hairston is one student headed the military's way—and
if there were more like him, recruiters wouldn't have to push everyone
else so hard. "I want to live a military life," he says pointedly.
He'll take a football scholarship at La Salle University, play two
years, then transfer to the U.S. Military Academy at West Point
or the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis.
He wanted to attend West Point right away, but when he scored 980 on
the SAT, admissions told him he'd need to score 1,000. He thought about
a two-year scholarship offer from Valley Forge Military College, then
La Salle came knocking. Hairston has also signed up for the Army
National Guard, which will earn him $10,000 more for his education.
Outside school, rather than looking for trouble, he's also a first
sergeant in the Civil Air Patrol, which performs U.S. Air
Force-directed search and rescue missions.
"Friends from Mastbaum say I've completely changed," Hairston says.
"They say I was a "bad boy' there, but [at Frankford], they say I'm the
man. Over here, I'm a soldier with a real future. I'm on the way to
protecting our country. [At Mastbaum], I was saying, "Screw my
country.'"
He's a kid who found the military, but it seems the military is increasingly intent on finding its way to more kids.
"I was only in JROTC for one year, and in that one year I only went to
class when I felt like it," Roxborough's Williams says. "After seeing
my stats in class and looking at the time period I stayed in JROTC,
they should have known I wasn't into it. The way the war is today, no
wonder they're having a hard time recruiting people."
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|