|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
Six Questions for Eli Flyer on Military Recruiting and Abuses in Iraq
Ken Silverstein, Harpers.org
July 27, 2006
1. We've seen a series of news reports about abuses of Iraqi civilians
by U.S. military personnel in Iraq. Are you surprised by this type of
misconduct?
Not too much new here. I have a scrapbook of news clips collected
during the 1980s and early 1990s that show members of the military
committing rapes, serial murders, sabotage, and the like—in large
numbers. They didn't get that much attention. Actually, the number of
news clips has been declining in recent years as recruit quality has
generally improved. The military services, however, still continue to
bring in sizable numbers of new recruits who should have been denied
enlistment. About one-third of new recruits do not complete their
initial tours of duty, with most of the discharges occurring for poor
behavior and performance. The culprit here is poor screening procedures
in selecting new recruits. It must come as a surprise to many people
that our troops commit such acts, given all the hype concerning their
bravery, patriotism, and all-American-boy attributes. So there is a
real letdown when a number of them are shown to be real screw-ups who
should never have been enlisted in the first place.
2. Don't the military services weed out applicants with criminal
offense records who are more likely to get in trouble while on active
duty?
Many applicants who are accepted for service have committed serious
misdemeanors, and some even have felony convictions, even though the
evidence is clear that these recruits are more likely than those with
"clean" records to show be behavior problems while on active duty. To
enlist with a conviction for a criminal offense, an applicant must
receive a "moral" waiver. The process involved in issuing a
waiver—evaluating reference recommendations for
enlistment—is a weak one that has little value for screening
purposes. It needs to be fixed. Since recruits who enlist with a moral
waiver generally have higher discharge rates than other recruits, they
should certainly receive more intensive screening for enlistment than
they do now. A number of the men who have been accused of abuses
against civilians in Iraq had histories that should have raised red
flags. For example, former soldier Steven Green, who is accused of
raping and killing an Iraqi girl and her family, enlisted with a moral
waiver for at least two drug- or alcohol- related offenses. He
committed a third alcohol-related offense just before enlistment, which
led to jail time, though this offense may not have been known to the
Army when he enlisted. News accounts say Green was a high school
dropout (with a GED certificate) and suggest he was a seriously
maladjusted young man. A limited background check during the
recruitment process would likely have provided information showing he
should not receive a moral waiver.
3. Doesn't the pressure to meet recruiting quotas also affect the quality of those brought into the military?
It is widely known that some recruiters will go to extraordinary
lengths to help qualify applicants for military service. Providing a
fraudulent high school diploma, ignoring an arrest record or a history
of mental disorder, coaching for an aptitude test or medical
exam—all these unacceptable recruiting practices, and many more,
will be used by some recruiters to meet their quotas. A shortage of
applicants leads to an increased pressure on recruiters to disregard
regulations and use unacceptable methods to meet their quotas.
4. Do recruitment shortages also affect policy at higher levels?
Most definitely. Research studies performed over many years have shown
that high school dropouts are more likely to present disciplinary
problems and to be discharged early when compared with recruits who
have high school diplomas. For this reason, Pentagon policy places a
limit of 10 percent on the number of enlistees who don't have a high
school diplomas. The Army has faced recruitment shortages since
1999—well before the negative effects of Iraq duty on
enlistments. As a result, the Army asked for and received Department of
Defense approval to bring in an additional 4,000
“GEDers”each year who would not count against the 10
percent ceiling for this group. The recruiting crunch continues, and to
meet recruitment goals this year, the Army has received permission to
bring in up to 8,000 additional GEDers. This will, of course, increase
the number of losses due to unsuitable behavior.
5. What is the Pentagon doing to develop more effective enlistment screening procedures?
It has long been recognized that applicants for service who enlist with
behavioral problems are at increased risk for substandard behavior and
early discharge. Starting over 20 years ago, the Department of Defense
invested over 10 million dollars in developing a pre-service behavioral
questionnaire that would be used to screen out those applicants most
likely to do poorly in military service. The Adaptability Screening
Profile (ASP), the proven product of this research effort, was readied
for use as a screening device for all service applicants starting in
1989. The military services, however, rejected its use because they
were concerned that it would disqualify a small number of recruits with
high school diplomas. They have paid the price since for this decision
with higher discharge rates. The ASP also has value for moral waiver
screening purposes, but the military services have shown little
interest in this application, since it would reduce the number of
offenders available for military service.
6. Are there any negative consequences in rejecting large numbers of potential recruits for unsatisfactory behavior?
I believe so. But while being turned down for enlistment is an
unpleasant experience, it certainly doesn't compare with the trauma
associated with being subsequently discharged from military service for
behavioral reasons. It should also be noted that military personnel
receive weapons training and there is some evidence that recruits
discharged for unsuitable behavior have a higher post-service arrest
rate than do those who are discharged normally. I once had a scrapbook
with news clips of their crimes after service, and it was pretty full,
too.
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|