|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
Military recruiting ads zero in on mom, dad
Parents, many of whom never served, are told of benefits
Joe Garofoli, San Francisco Chronicle
October 16, 2005
With public support for the Iraq war dropping and military recruits
becoming harder to attract, the Pentagon started an ad campaign Monday
that skips patriotic images and focuses on the difficult conversations
that young people have with their parents about joining up.
The $10 million campaign by the military's marketing arm urges parents
to "make it a two-way conversation" with children looking to join the
military. In four 30-second spots on cable networks and in print ads in
publications ranging from O, The Oprah Magazine to Field and Stream,
the appeals urge parents -- many of whom, the Pentagon realizes, have
never served in the military -- to learn more about the services.
Military officials say the ads aren't a response to falling poll
numbers and emphasize that they have long tried to connect with people
the Pentagon calls influencers -- parents, coaches, teachers and other
adults who affect a potential recruit's life.
However, in contrast to past campaigns, the new ads focus less on a
patriotic call to military service ("Uncle Sam Wants You") and
opportunities for self-advancement ("Be all you can be"). The
military's market surveys told them that families wanted a different
reason for their children to join.
"Patriotism resonates with everybody," said Air Force Maj. Rene
Stockwell, chief of joint advertisements for the Joint Advertising
Market Research and Studies, which helped produce the advertisements.
"But just because it resonates with someone doesn't mean that they'll
recommend military service."
The ads are being released at a time when peace activists are trying to
limit the military's access to potential recruits in public schools.
One such activist, Gail Sredanovic of the group Raging Grannies, said
the new campaign glosses over the disadvantages of serving in the
military, especially during a war.
"If you want information about a car, you don't ask the used car
dealer," said Sredanovic, who lives in Menlo Park. "You ask Consumer
Reports."
In all of the four TV commercials released Monday, the camera takes the
point of view of the parents. Shot in the no-frills style of a public
service announcement, each ad features a teenage boy or girl looking
directly into the camera and pleading the case for joining the military.
The parents are silent, their gaze occasionally wandering to a child's
bicycle in the yard, or to their hands fumbling nervously with a salt
shaker, or to people gathering on a street corner. Stockwell said this
was meant to convey the awkwardness of the conversations.
"Mom, you know how I love being on the water, right? How I love the
environment?" a young man asks his mother as they talk on their back
porch. "I can be part of an environmental response team working on oil
cleanups and stuff. I'm serious about this.
"So what do you think?" the young man asks. A voice-over urges parents
to "make it a two-way conversation" and points them to the military's
Web site www.todaysmilitary.com.
The site, Stockwell said, is aimed at a generation of parents who
"aren't as likely to have served in the military and don't have that
firsthand knowledge." The site is designed to supply that knowledge
with sections like, "Myths vs. Reality."
Another spot begins with a mother scanning a kitchen table covered with
bills and calculator as her daughter tells her that she wants to join
as a way to gain experience for medical school. "It will be good for my
career," the daughter says.
In another, a young man is working on a car in front of a home.
"C'mon, Dad," he says into the camera, "You always said, 'Finish
what you start.' " The son says he already has discipline and
determination -- "I need a place where they can come out, where they
matter.
"Dad," the son says, "talk to me."
As advertising, the spots are "quite powerful and emotional,"
said Betsy DePalma Sperry, managing director of Grey San Francisco, an
advertising firm.
But Sperry said the ads skirt the issue that would worry a parent
most -- the possibility their son or daughter will die in combat.
"I think there's a need, therefore, to call a spade a spade: You're
going in to serve a higher calling at great risk," Sperry wrote in an
e-mail. "I know this would recall earlier messaging of patriotism,
which may not play to current audiences, but I question whether any
such conversation -- informed or otherwise -- could address the main
barriers (to recruiting)."
The military is slightly behind its active duty recruiting goals for
the year, October statistics from the Department of Defense show. Four
of the military's six reserve components are behind their targets.
Polls show that some parents have their doubts about the
military, too. A survey of 1,500 adults this month by Pew Research
Center for the People and the Press found that 44 percent felt that the
United States made the right decision in using military force against
Iraq, compared with 51 percent who felt that way in January.
Brian Hurley, a partner with the San Francisco advertising firm Grant,
Scott & Hurley, said the ads were honest in that they "there are so
many people between 18 and 24 in the U.S. for whom life is bleak enough
that the military seems a good option. Or, as these ads imply, the only
option."
But Hurley said they made him wonder whether the "military, like our
government in general, is in such sorry shape that thoughtful,
well-intentioned people have thrown up their hands and said, 'We can't
show people jumping out of planes or helicopters anymore, we can't tell
them about the great training they'll get, or how people the world over
will admire them.' We have to be plain and honest that today's military
is at least a choice."
Although the ads may not contain patriotic images or "I want you!"
calls to service, the military's core values such as discipline,
determination and commitment are conveyed in the dialogue, said David
Swaebe, a spokesman for Mullen, the Boston-area ad firm that created
the campaign for the military.
Megan Matson, an organizer with San Francisco-based Leave My Child
Alone, which focuses on controlling the release of student information
to military recruiters, found the ads encouraging in that the military
"has spent all this money on focus groups, and they're recognizing that
they need to take a different tack."
"The focus groups must have shown that no one over 19 is falling for
the glitz anymore (Army rodeo teams, babes on humvees, the adventure of
it all, etc.) and they had better look real, and look like they care,"
Matson wrote in a separate e-mail. The Bolinas resident is a former
creative director at a New York advertising agency.
One military historian said advertising campaigns can only do so much.
"I don't think it's going to work as long as there's a war still going
on," said Larry Suid, a military historian and co-author of "Stars
& Stripes on Screen: A Comprehensive Guide to Portrayals of
American Military on Film." "They're trying to market at a time when
the market isn't that good."
E-mail Joe Garofoli at jgarofoli@sfchronicle.com.
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|