COUNTERING MILITARY RECRUITMENT
Articles: Military Recruiting: General
Beware of Child Predators
Laurence M. Vance, LewRockwell. com
January 29, 2007
There is a new breed of child predator on the loose. You won't findhim featured on America's Most Wanted or appearing on the FBI's Ten
Most Wanted list. Up until now parents who were concerned about
child predators could check their state's Sex Offender Registries or
the Child Predator Watch List. But now we can thank Ladies Home
Journal magazine for informing parents about this dangerous new
predator in an article that appears in the latest issue (February
2007) called "This Man Wants Your Children."
I don't normally read Ladies Home Journal. In fact, I don't think I
had ever read a single copy until I happened recently to look
through the latest issue. Unfortunately, Ladies Home Journal has
enlisted in the service of the state. The purpose of its thirteen-
page child predator article was not to warn parents about predators
at all – it was to promote them.
You see, "This Man Wants Your Children" was not about sex offenders –
even though some of them are sex offenders – it was about Army
recruiters; specifically, Sergeant First Class Chad Christenson, one
of the top Army recruiters in the country. Indeed, Sgt. Christenson
was the Army's "Recruiter of the Year" in 2005.
We learn a number of things in this article about recruiters and
recruiting. The 2005 military recruiting budget was about $4
billion. Since the recruiting numbers were way down in 2005, "the
Army added 1,000 new recruiters, doubled the maximum sign-in bonus
from $20,000 to $40,000, relaxed standards and raised the maximum-
age limit." Then there was the new $200 million ad campaign for
2006. We are also told that "in 2005 the Army officially
investigated 836 allegations of recruiter misconduct." The Army now
accepts lower entrance scores on aptitude tests, grants more "moral
waivers" to allow convicted criminals to enlist, and allows non-
citizens to gain their citizenship after only one year of active
duty. The enlistment age has been raised from 35 to 40 to 42. Older
women who want to enlist will find that the physical fitness
requirements are now less rigorous – they must now be able to do
three push-ups. Oh, and the Army now has a MySpace profile.
Thanks to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, which mandates
that "public high school administrators are required to allow
military recruiters access to students or risk losing federal
funding," Christenson preys on high school students. He is stationed
in Texas, "the state that contributed more 2005 and 2006 Army
enlistees than any other." He is paid about $64,000 to "show young
Texans how the Army can enrich their lives." I know public high
school teachers that make half of that and private high school
teachers who make less than half of that. Christenson says the Army
changed his life – "It made me who I am." But who he is?
We read in this article about some of the people Christenson
persuades to join the Army. One recruit tells him that he wants to
serve in the infantry. His reason: "It's a moral thing with me.
After what happened on 9/11, I can't live with myself if I don't go
to war." Does Christenson tell the young man that the war in Iraq
has nothing to do with 9/11? Why not? "We have no evidence that
Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th," said
Christenson' s commander in chief in answer to a reporter's question
on September 17, 2003, after hundreds of U.S. soldiers had already
died for a lie. Another recruit is a forty-one-year- old mother of
five. Does Christenson tell her that it would better if she stayed
home with her family? Does he tell her about the female U.S.
soldiers who have been killed in Iraq? Why not? I have posted their
names and pictures here.
What else is Christenson not telling young men and women about the
U.S. military? Is he telling them that the military does very little
to actually defend the country? Is he telling them that the military
is not defending our freedoms? Is he telling them that the military
is protecting the shores, guarding the borders, and patrolling the
coasts of other countries instead of our own? Is he telling them
that the military is garrisoning the planet with its military bases?
Is he telling them that the war in Iraq has lasted longer than the
war against Nazi Germany? Is he telling them that the military has
troops in over 150 different regions of the world?
Why not?
Sgt. Christenson is supposed to be an honest man. We are told in the
Ladies Home Journal article that he is "familiar with the dark side
of recruiting, of course – the improprieties brought on by the
pressure to meet quotas," but that "he scrupulously avoids the sorts
of ethical lapses – such as misleading potential recruits (or their
parents) about the chances of going to Iraq – that have tripped up
other recruiters." This means that he doesn't tell students that the
war in Iraq is over in order to get them to enlist – like some Army
recruiters did. So why doesn't he tell young men and women the whole
story?
I wonder how many people would join the Army if the gentleman in
this picture were a recruiter? Since he left his legs in Iraq – or
what was left of them – for what will go down in history as the lie
of the century, perhaps he would be more inclined to give a little
more information to potential recruits than Sgt. Christenson.
Instead of talking about the amount of a sign-in bonus, he could
talk about the more than 3,000 U.S. soldiers that have been killed
in Iraq. Instead of speaking about the free health care that the
military provides, he could speak about the hundreds of disabled
soldiers who are missing body parts like he is. Instead of
discussing the amount of money available from the military for
college, he could discuss the costs of the war in Iraq – now over
$200 million a day. Instead of mentioning the structure and
stability that the military provides, he could mention the tens of
thousands – and perhaps hundreds of thousands – of Iraqis who have
been killed since the U.S. invaded Iraq almost four years ago.
Instead of conversing about how the military has lowered enlistment
standards, he could converse about the evils of an interventionist
U.S. foreign policy that sends young men to die for a lie. And
instead of informing potential soldiers about the variety of
positions available in the military, he could inform them about the
animosity that exists between the Sunni and Shiite Muslims that has
now erupted – thanks to the United States – into a civil war.
Perhaps some disabled soldiers who now realize that they gave their
limbs in vain should sue the U.S. military under the Americans with
Disabilities Act for the right to be a recruiter. I wonder what
employing handicapped soldiers would do for enlistment quotas?
Protect your children and the children of everyone you know: Warn
them about child predators – and especially those in uniform.
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of