|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
333,000 US Casualties: Are They Covered?
Maya Schenwar, Truthout
February 14, 2008
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) will treat about 333,000
sick and injured veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars in 2009,
according to VA statistics released last week. That number is a 14
percent increase over this year's casualty total. Yet, despite the Bush
administration's promises to prioritize the VA even as other domestic
departments' funds are cut, its annual budget request for next year
places more financial burdens than ever on many returning soldiers.
At first glance, Bush's 2009 budget may seem like a
boon to veterans: It would increase the VA budget by $3.4 billion.
"The President's ongoing commitment to those who
have faithfully served this country in uniform is clearly demonstrated
through this budget request for VA," said VA Secretary James B. Peake
at a budget hearing last Thursday. "Resources requested for
discretionary programs in 2009 are more than double the funding level
in effect when the president took office seven years ago."
However, veterans' advocates argue the budget's
growth has not kept pace with the skyrocketing size of the veteran
community - or the increasing cost of servicing them.
"Bush only provides the news on the increased budget
without providing full facts on the increased demands and costs," said
Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense.
Although the "discretionary spending" Peake mentions
has indeed doubled since Bush entered office, the VA budget as a whole
has only increased by about a third - roughly in proportion to the
growth of the veteran population, according to VA statistics.
Peake's comparison of today's VA budget to that of
seven years ago also sidesteps the reality of changing market values.
Congressman Bob Filner, chairman of the House Veterans Affairs'
Committee, says that regardless of the administration's sweeping
claims, the 2009 VA budget is not much improvement over last year's.
According to Filner, the budget's much-touted 5.5 percent increase for
veteran health care "barely covers the cost of medical inflation."
"The service and sacrifice of our veterans is real,
and the budget for the VA must provide realistic funding levels to meet
these needs," Filner said in a statement upon the budget's release. "I
am concerned that this budget proposal contains only modest increases
for veterans' health care while paying for this slight increase with
cuts in other veterans' programs below the historic levels this
Congress provided for in this fiscal year."
For example, the new budget would require veterans
to pay more out-of-pocket expenses, such as pharmacy co-pays and annual
enrollment fees. Also, under Bush's plan, the VA's medical research
budget would drop below 2007 levels, with the expectation the
department would outsource its research needs.
"The VA reduces its research budget [in 2009] and
sets sights on coordinating with other agency research activities,
agencies such as the Institute of Medicine," said Rick Jones,
legislative director of the National Association for Uniformed
Services. "With so much unknown on traumatic brain injury and
post-traumatic stress disorder, it seems ill-advised to depend on
outside-agency coordination when these issues are veteran-centric."
The administration's proposal cuts the VA medical
and prosthetic research budget by 8 percent and veterans'
rehabilitation research by 7 percent.
It also slashes construction funds for new medical
facilities by about 44 percent, with grants for construction of
extended care facilities losing 49 percent.
Moreover, after the 2009 VA budget increase, the
Bush plan calls for billions of dollars in budget cuts over the next
four years, according to Filner. For a system already playing a losing
game of catch-up, the reductions could be devastating.
"The VA's backlog of claims and appeals has been
exacerbated by funding shortfalls," said Jay Agg, national
communications director for American Veterans (AMVETS). "Currently,
870,000 veterans are awaiting decisions from the VA, a process that may
take many months or even years. That's about the same size as 15 Yankee
Stadiums full of veterans."
The administration has shown no signs of altering
its 2009 VA request; in fact, it is currently immersed in a lawsuit
defending its right to deny health care to Iraq and Afghanistan
veterans.
However, veterans' advocacy groups aren't giving up.
During last Thursday's testimony, Jones and representatives from
several other organizations, including AMVETS, presented "The
Independent Budget" (IB): their own proposal for next year's VA
spending. It would up the Bush budget by almost $3 billion, emphasizing
mental health research and medical facility construction.
"The IB is by veterans, for veterans, and provides a
full picture of veterans' needs and how our government can meet them,"
Agg said. "Our position is that the administration and Congress, having
authorized funding for war, must now be prepared to provide sufficient,
timely and predictable funding to meet the needs of our war fighters."
Despite the Bush administration's firm stance on the
VA budget, some advocates see signs of hope. Last Thursday's hearing
was not a battle, according to Sullivan; in fact, administration
officials appeared interested in listening to what the "other side" had
to say.
"While Secretary Peake and VA's top political
appointees testified first, they broke their usual pattern of quickly
departing the hearing room," Sullivan said. "Instead of bolting for the
door, Peake asked Under Secretary Kussman and Under Secretary Cooper to
remain, and they all remained and listened to the testimony of ten
different [veteran] groups."
As casualties mount and the end of the Bush
administration draws nearer, Congress will take up the VA request and,
likely by this summer, propose its own version of the budget.
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|