|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
Reservists finding their old jobs gone
Ann McFeatters, Peporter-News.com
March 4, 2007
WASHINGTON
- Last week we learned that many of our disabled Iraq-war veterans are
being shafted by the military and medical bureaucracy. Now we find out
that some reservists and members of the National Guard are returning
home to find their jobs gone.
Although there is a 1994 law - the Uniformed Services Employment and
Re-employment Rights Act - requiring reservists to be fairly and
quickly re-hired after deployment, it is often not enforced. A military
office called Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve, whose local
branches returning soldiers are to contact if they can't get their jobs
back, has just two press releases on its Web site for 2007.
One said: ''The military is grateful to the civilian employers of
National Guardsmen and reservists who support their employees when
they're called to duty, said Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff,'' in a statement in Anchorage, Alaska, a few
days ago.
January's press release said the Department of Defense will mobilize
Guard and reserve members by units, increasing the odds of multiple
deployments by individuals. While it said the goal is only one year of
involuntary deployment and five years of non-mobilization, because of
''today's global demands'' that will not be possible for all units.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, the Department of Defense has mobilized more than
500,000 reservists and Guard members. Sometimes they make up nearly
half of the U.S. ground troops fighting abroad.
An investigation of the military's employer-support office last year
for Denver magazine, by Maximillian Potter, argued that although it
should be a ''tremendous resource'' for returning U.S. troops, it is
''a bureaucratic mess, mired in incompetence, undermined by conflict of
interest and accountable to no one.''
A new report in February by the Government Accountability Office found
that the Pentagon does not even know the scope of the problems
reservists face when they try to go back to work. In 2005, one out of
seven was thought to return jobless.
Under the 1994 law, there are about 12,400 formal complaints filed each
year alleging that employers refused to give returning reservists and
Guard members their old jobs. The GAO said Congress hears about 2,400
of those complaints.
The GAO report concluded that the Departments of Defense, Justice and
Labor and the Office of Special Counsel have different ways of
approaching the law and don't compare cases, one reason for the chaos
and confusion. The Department of Veterans Affairs, which is taking heat
for the problems that returning soldiers face, oddly, is not involved
in employee claims under the 1994 law.
An Air Force nurse with 32 years in the military, seven in active duty
and nearly two-dozen medals for valor and service was terminated from
her civilian health-care job of 10 years when she was sent to Iraq for
four months last year.
She is not alone. Increasingly, as reservists and Guard members return
home after service in Iraq, they are finding their jobs were eliminated
or their pay checks were smaller or promised promotions disappeared.
Last November, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management sent its annual
report to Congress on veterans and disabled veterans working for the
federal government. The press release said, ''And by every measure, the
Bush administration is living up to its commitment to make career
opportunities available to soldiers, sailors and airmen.'' The report
said the total number of veterans employed in 2005 out of a federal
government work force of 1.8 million was 456,254. But the number of
veterans newly hired in 2005 was only 5,000 more than the number hired
in 2004.
That was also when 36 members of the Florida National Guard got
letters, while serving in combat in Iraq, informing them that their
jobs in a federal drug-interdiction program were abolished.
The Denver magazine report told of a 53-year-old Marine, in the service
for 29 years, who deployed for nine months in Kuwait and Iraq in 2002
and 2003.
When he got home, he was fired from his $88,000-a-year job in a firm
where he'd worked for 19 years. He was allegedly told by the Department
of Labor, where his commanding officer referred him, that he didn't
have a legal case unless he heard somebody say he was fired because of
his military service.
The officer, a lawyer, was so outraged, that he fought for the Marine,
who won $324,082 in U.S. District Court in Colorado. As of late last
year, reporter Potter said the Marine was still looking for a job with
health insurance for his family.
The National Committee of Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve
says veterans with job problems should call one of its ombudsmen from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m. CT Monday through Friday at 1-800-336-4590. Sometimes
you can get a real person.
The betting is that there will be thousands of cases as returning
reservists and Guard members try to reclaim their old jobs. The betting
is that many will be out of luck.
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|