|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
Black Soldiers Cleared in WWII Lynching
Seattle Times
October 29, 2007
SEATTLE - For more than a half-century, the convictions of 28
African-American soldiers for a riot that ended in the lynching of an
Italian prisoner of war at Seattle's Fort Lawton during World War II
has held an uneasy place in history.
It was the Army's largest court-martial of the war, and it was one of the region's worst conflicts between blacks and whites.
Last week, the incident gained a new place in history. In what is
believed to be an unprecedented ruling after a yearlong review, an Army
review board tossed out the convictions after finding the trial was
"fundamentally unfair."
The ruling on Oct. 26 by the Army's highest administrative- review
board has granted honorable discharges and back pay for four soldiers
whose families petitioned for the review. And it will likely apply to
the other 24 soldiers if their families also petition, according to
attorneys involved in the case.
Only two of the soldiers are still alive.
"It's a real beautiful thing," said one of them, Samuel Snow, 84, of Leesburg, Fla.
The decision reflects a willingness by the government to "correct the record," said Col. Dan Baggio, the Army's chief spokesman.
"We learn by mistakes, when we do make mistakes, even when it takes a
long time," he said Friday. "We feel good about getting it right."
The unusual review by the Army's Board for Correction of Military
Records began more than a year ago at the request of Rep. Jim
McDermott, D-Wash., who had read about the August 1944 incident in "On
American Soil," a book by Seattle author Jack Hamann.
In 1944, Fort Lawton was an important staging ground for the war in the
Pacific. Snow's all-black unit in the segregated Army was preparing to
ship out for New Guinea. While they waited, the men were barracked near
a group of about 200 Italian prisoners of war who worked as laborers at
the fort.
Tensions between the Italians and Americans both black and white rose
for a number of reasons. Italians got leave to drink in off-base bars
that didn't serve blacks, and also chased the same Seattle girls
pursued by white soldiers.
"It was racial, real racial," recalled Snow. "I never slept with white soldiers, or ate in a white mess hall."
The night of the riot, some of the black soldiers and some of the
Italians exchanged drunken insults and fought, Hamann said. Then a
white military policeman "fanned the tensions" of the black soldiers
and whipped their anger into a riot, probably because he resented the
Italians for courting local women.
The next morning, an Italian private, Guglielmo Olivotto, was found
hanged in the woods. A Seattle Times story at the time said 26 Italians
were hospitalized after the black soldiers "stormed the barracks of the
former Axis soldiers," reportedly with rocks, sticks and knives.
Although only two Italians could identify their attackers, 43 black
soldiers were tried in a combined trial. All of them were represented
by two defense lawyers, including Howard Noyd, who is now 92 and living
in Bellevue, Wash.. Noyd recalled Friday that he had about 10 days to
prepare, not enough time to even interview all the defendants.
Defense lawyers were also denied access to an Army inspector general's
investigation, which included suggestions that the white military
policeman might have been involved in the lynching. Yet the prosecutors
were able to draw from evidence in the "confidential" report.
"It was a very critical point," Noyd said. "We wanted all the
investigation that the government was using, and we were denied that
privilege."
In the end, 28 of the soldiers, including Snow, were convicted of
rioting. Two were convicted of manslaughter in Olivotto's death. Snow
served a year in the brig. Other soldiers served as many as 25 years.
In its ruling, the Army board said the lack of preparation time
afforded the defense, along with the denial of access to the inspector
general's report, meant the soldiers didn't get a fair trail. The panel
noted that the white military policeman, who had testified against the
black soldiers, was later convicted of abandoning his post during the
riot.
Left unstated in the report is mention of the racial inequities that permeated the segregated wartime Army.
"You have to remember, it comes out of an era when racial relations
were awful," said Rep. McDermott. "When you look at the facts, it was
so egregious. I think the Army, for its own pride, had to say, `We made
a horrible mistake here and we have to make it right.'"
Experts in military justice said that they were aware of no larger case of military convictions being overturned.
"I think it is terrific sign that the military justice system is
reckoning with its past mistakes," said Elizabeth Hillman, a visiting
law professor at the University of California, Berkeley. "Without the
political pressure, this never would have happened."
It remained uncertain how much the surviving soldiers and the heirs of
the deceased might end up getting in back pay and benefits because of
the ruling. Baggio, the Army spokesman, said those decisions had not
yet been made.
But at the very least, the ruling will give families benefits such as a
marble headstone and a flag presented by the Army to veterans, Hamann
said.
"I have to be saddened that most went to their grave knowing this
injustice was done and not living to see it corrected," he said.
After the war, Snow went back to his hometown of Leesburg to work as a
church janitor and raise two children. But because of his dishonorable
discharge, he couldn't get such benefits as the GI Bill for education
and veterans health care.
Snow said he could definitely use the money a settlement would bring.
But he was more concerned on about finally getting an honorable
discharge.
Years ago, in an effort to hide the conviction from his children - even
though he considered it a racist injustice - he set fire to his Army
paperwork.
"I'm rejoicing today," said Snow. "I'm not mad at nobody. I'm just as satisfied as can be."
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene,
Oregon’s Committee for Countering
Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to others individuals and
groups with similar goals.
Because our web site is public, personal comments about the
articles and (frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not included.
If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to the
Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s headline into the search
line, which should bring up (often wise and useful) commentary and corrections.
If you do not belong to the List Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles
on this site are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|