COUNTERING MILITARY RECRUITMENT
Articles: Leaving Military: Stop-Loss
When a bonus isn’t a bonus, Murray fires
LES BLUMENTHAL, The Tacoma News Tribune
October 16, 2005
WASHINGTON
– The Pentagon has reneged on its offer to pay a $15,000
bonus to members of the National Guard and Army Reserve who agree
to extend their enlistments by six years, according to Sen. Patty
Murray (D-Seattle).
The bonuses were offered in January to Active Guard and Reserve
and military technician soldiers who were serving overseas. In
April, the Office of the Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs
ordered the bonuses stopped, Murray said.
“This is outrageous,” the senator said in a telephone
interview. “It makes me angry that this administration has
broken another promise to our troops.”
A Pentagon spokeswoman, Lt. Col. Ellen Krenke, confirmed the
bonuses had been canceled, saying they violated Pentagon policies
because they duplicated other programs. She said Guard and
Reserve members would be eligible for other bonuses.
Krenke said some soldiers had been paid the re-enlistment
bonuses, but she was unsure how many or whether the money would
have to be repaid. Murray’s office said that as far as it
knew, no active Guard or Reserve members had received the bonuses.
A Murray spokeswoman, Alex Glass, said Krenke’s explanation was unacceptable.
“They can spin it anyway they want,” Glass said.
“But this is a promise they are trying to explain
away.”
The bonus offer was part of the Pentagon’s effort to retain
Guard and Reserve members at a time of declining enlistments in
the regular Army.
Army officials have said they face the toughest recruiting
climate since 1973, when the draft was dropped and replaced with
an all-volunteer military.
Roughly 3,400 members of the Washington National Guard’s
81st Armor Brigade were serving in Iraq at the time the bonuses
were offered.
The bonuses were tax-free because they involved soldiers stationed overseas.
“As in the private sector, bonuses are quite effective in
keeping talented people with high demand skills,” Krenke
said in an e-mail response to questions.
Murray, a leading Capitol Hill critic of management of the
Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs, said she
didn’t know why the bonuses were dropped but suspected it
was connected to the tight federal budget.
“It feels like every day I wake up to something else gone
wrong,” she said. “And it all goes back to this
administration not planning adequately for the Iraq war.”
Krenke said the decision to end the bonus program had nothing to do with budgeting.
The senator said she first learned the bonus program had been
canceled this summer from members of the Washington National
Guard. In late August she wrote officials of the Pentagon’s
National Guard Bureau demanding an immediate explanation.
The decision to cancel the bonuses had caused
“tremendous uncertainty” among Guard members who had
been counting on the money after they decided to re-enlist,
Murray said in her August letter.
In a two-paragraph reply to Murray, Donna Warren, the National
Guard Bureau’s congressional liaison, said the bonus
program had been scrubbed by order of the Office of Secretary of
Defense for Reserve Affairs. Warren said it had been discovered
that Defense Department regulations prohibited such bonuses, but
she offered no elaboration.
Warren said the bonuses remained a “critical issue”
and that officials of the Guard bureau were “aggressively
engaged” in discussions with the defense secretary’s
office.
Murray said Warren’s response was inadequate. Earlier this
month she wrote Thomas Hall, assistant secretary of defense for
reserve affairs. Murray asked not only for a further explanation,
but also asked Hall to reverse himself and reinstate the bonus
program.
Krenke said the Pentagon would have no comment on Murray’s letter to Hall.
Murray said she expected a quick response and would pursue the
matter further if Hall’s response were insufficient.
Les Blumenthal: 202-383-0008
lblumenthal@mcclatchydc.com
This archive consists of a topically organized selection of
articles culled by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of