|
Who
We Are
Articles
Upcoming
Events
Past
Events
Downloads
Links
No
Child Left Behind
Political
Cartoons
Contact
Us
|
"Oh Baby, It's Drafty Out There"
Frida Berrigan, AlterNet
July 5, 2005
Feeling a draft?" asks the Village Voice.
"Talk of a draft is chilling," intones The New York Times.
Even fashion magazines weigh in: "Could Cosmo girl get drafted?"
In city streets, town squares and rural strip malls, military
recruiters are beleaguered. The Army is unable to meet recruiting
targets even after lowering quotas and standards. At the same time,
recruiters are overwhelmed by scandal and scrutiny, and uncomfortable
in the face of growing anti-war sentiment.
Though half a world away, the war in Iraq feels close. Mounting U.S.
casualties, exhausted soldiers and an intractable civil conflict in
which the only thing different factions agree on is that U.S. soldiers
are the problem, make military service increasingly unattractive to
even the most gung-ho patriot. Meanwhile, Washington is determined to
"stay the course" right over the brink.
J.E. McNeil, executive director of the Center on Conscience and War, is
preparing for the worst. She sees a "perfect storm" of conditions
brewing a return to the draft. So far, more than one million U.S.
military personnel have served in Iraq and Afghanistan. An estimated
341,000 soldiers have done double deployments (and many are now
entering their third deployment). And they are not just serving, they
are dying. More than 1,700 have been killed, and an average of two more
soldiers die each day.
Recruiting Nightmares
For more and more young people, joining the military doesn't mean "Be
all you can be," it means going to war. And the Army is feeling the
chill.
Major General Michael Rochelle, Army Recruiting Commander, worries that
the war and other military commitments present the "toughest challenge
to the all-volunteer army" since its inception in 1973. Staff Sergeant
Spurgeon M. Shelly, a recruiter, complains how tough recruiting is. "I
will hear 'No' more times in one day than a child would hear in their
entire childhood. If I had hair, I would pull it out."
He signed up four recruits in six months, putting him way below his quota of two recruits per month.
Recruiters are hiding police records, mental illness and physical
ailments to make their quotas. An Army investigation into recruitment
improprieties found 1,118 incidents involving one in five recruiters.
The Army substantiated 320 of these cases in 2004, up from 213 in 2002
and 199 in 1999. Recruiters and some senior army officers admit that
for every documented impropriety, there are at least two more that are
never discovered. "We have to play fast and loose with the rules just
to get by," one recruiter told The New York Times.
Another recruiter laments, "The only people who want to join the Army
now have issues; they're troubled, with health, police or drug
problems."
After a dismal record of missed quotas each month throughout the
spring, the Army stalled on releasing enlistment data for May. Finally
in mid-June, the Army reported achieving 75 percent of its monthly
recruiting goal of 6,700. But the Army did not attract more recruits;
it moved the goal posts, lowering its May target from 8,050 new
recruits, asserting it would make up the difference this summer.
Furthest From Our Thoughts?
The Pentagon and the President promise that the draft is a thing of the
past. "The D-word is the farthest thing from my thoughts," Francis J.
Harvey, Secretary of the Army, told a Washington Post reporter in
March, laughing.
The Pentagon's position is that a professional all-volunteer army
performs better, has higher morale and is less costly to train. Last
October, President Bush was adamant on the question, saying, "I want
every American to understand that, as long as I am President, there
will be no draft."
The Nixon administration retired the military draft in 1973, but
mandatory registration of men at the age of 18 was reinstituted in 1980
under President Carter, and today the Selective Service System has 13.5
million men ages 18-25 registered.
McNeil's perspective that the draft is creeping back is strengthened by
recent announcements by Selective Service that it can now register and
draft healthcare workers, computer specialists, linguists and other
personnel if necessary. In March, the SSS issued a report notifying the
President that "it would be ready to implement a draft within 75 days"
following Congressional authorization. While spokesman Richard Flahavan
says the steps are "strictly in the planning stages," and the report
was part of the SSS' annual budget request, these moves agitate fears
of a returning draft.
Military expert David Segal believes that a new military conscription
policy would galvanize an anti-draft movement that would dwarf that of
the 1960s. The expectation that the draft would rouse a complacent
populace into a powerful and mainstream anti-war movement fuels the
draft-watch fixation of websites like Nodraftnoway.org,
Stopthedraft.com and Draftfreedom.org.
The Wrong Question
But, for many in the counter-recruitment movement, "Is the draft coming back?" is the wrong question.
Marti Hiken, co-chair of the Military Law Taskforce, does not see the
draft on the far-off horizon; she sees it as existing reality for
hundreds of thousands of Americans.
There is the "poverty draft" of young people who are told the military
is their only path to a career; the "backdoor draft" of the Stop-Loss
program which mandates soldiers stay in active duty for up to 24 months
after their contracts have expired; "the senior draft" in which
reservists (who make up 40 percent of the fighting force in Iraq) are
compelled back into active military service; and finally, there is the
"secret draft" of mercenaries and private military contractors.
For Hiken, worrying about the draft is an abstraction compared to the
havoc wreaked by these real but covert forms of compulsory service.
For every covert draft, Hiken sees grassroots groups countering and
gaining traction. A lot of the energy is focused on the outrages of
Stop-Loss, which has been legally challenged eight times so far. One
suit, brought by Emiliano Santiago in Oregon, climbed to the Supreme
Court before it was rejected and Santiago was shipped off to
Afghanistan to re-join his unit. Representative Jim McDermott (D-WA)
championed Santiago's case, saying on the floor of the House,
"Santiago's plight should be known and feared by every high school
junior and senior across the country. The ugly little secret in the
Pentagon is that Emiliano Santiago's voluntary service is involuntary."
Hiken says that even though Santiago lost his case, the ruling "fanned
the fires of counter-recruitment work," and made people "think twice
before signing up for the military," playing a "critical role in
lowering enlistment levels."
Another case, on behalf of soldier David W. Qualls and seven John Does,
was filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C in December and is
still in the motions phase. Overall, Hiken says, "I have not seen a
grassroots movement like the one we have now. In every community people
are fighting."
Military Unwelcome
Rick Jahnkow, an organizer with the Committee Opposed to Militarism and
the Draft, thinks more people should be joining those fights rather
than wringing their hands about a possible draft.
The longtime counter-recruitment activist says it's not "a total waste
of time to talk about the draft," but he is quick to add that it is not
enough.
"We have to reverse the militarization of school, campus and society,"
says Jahnkow, listing "military recruitment, the poverty draft, the
militarization of curriculum through Junior Reserve Officers' Training
Corps (J-ROTC)" as important targets. He worries that young people's
acculturation to the military will make a future draft easier. "We need
to undermine and delegitimize those programs, make them unwelcome," he
says.
That is exactly what people are doing in communities around the country.
Kevin Ramirez, an organizer with Central Committee for Conscientious
Objectors, catalogues recent actions making the military very unwelcome
in schools and on campuses.
At Seattle Central Community College in January, "students literally
chased Army recruiters off campus." The following month, college
students in New Haven tabling with counter-recruitment materials
"received so much positive attention from other students" that the
military recruiters packed up their tables and left. In Bloomington,
Minnesota, Ramirez continues, a high school group fought their
administration and the American Legion to allow "counter-recruitment
tables and information" equal access to their school and they won.
The movement against Stop-Loss, counter-recruitment actions, young
people organizing to get the military out of their schools, and the
ongoing work to end the war and bring the troops home resonates today
and tomorrow, whether or not President Bush asks Congress to vote to
reinstate the draft. These movements sustain hope and save lives, while
hinting at what a de-militarized United States would look like. These
movements prove that we don't have to wait for a draft to have an
impact.
Frida Berrigan serves on the National Committee of the War Resisters League.
This
archive consists of a topically organized selection of articles culled
by members of the Counter-Recruitment List Serve from printed
publications and web sites. The archive is not complete. We have chosen
material relevant to the work of Eugene, Oregon’s Committee
for Countering Military Recruitment that we think may be of use to
others individuals and groups with similar goals.
Because
our web site is public, personal comments about the articles and
(frequent) corrections of reporters’ errors are also not
included. If an article interests you, we encourage you to return to
the Counter-Recruitment List Serve and put the article’s
headline into the search line, which should bring up (often wise and
useful) commentary and corrections. If you do not belong to the List
Serve, it can be found at counter-recruitment@yahoogroups.com
In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles on this site
are posted without profit to those who have expressed prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational
purposed.
|